It's okay to hurt three year olds who voted for Bush the last time.
Ever wonder why some of us would oppose Rnold becoming president? Because we open the door for the Daniel Ortega wannabe henchmen to run for the presidency. Though Roger Calero can't be the President of the United States, he still managed to get on the ballot. Roger Calero, born in Nicaragua, is the nominee for the Socialist Workers Party and according to politics1.com - the SWP has evolved into a hardline communist party advocating the brand of authoritarian politics espoused by Cuban President Fidel Castro's style of Marxism.
Also the duo states that they are "standing up to the brutal effects of the deepening global crisis of the capitalist system." Having said that, then I am certain they approve of our embargo over socialist Cuba, after all, Socialist would never need the money of evil capitalist. That evil capitalist country called America should never give money to superior and compassionate socialist countries.
But Democrats have other choices between John Kerry and an ineligible Calero. There are other candidates that also espouse a more dictatorial control over society, even more so than Kerry. Socialist Equality Party is putting up Bill Van Auken or you could vote for LGBT liberation AND Socialism by casting your vote for John Parker. Left wingers can still vote for Nader. You don't have to waste your vote on John Kerry.
And speekun of Kerry, how ridiculous have liberals become? How many times have we heard that stupid line about the economy being the worst it has been since Herbert Hoover? Had Herbert Hoover been Democrat, they'd complain this was the worst economy ever. Quite frankly, I don't know what they are talking about when I hear how bad the economy is... look at the help wanted section in your local newspaper. Chances are that there is a ton of businesses looking for employees but not a whole lot of ads from people looking for work. The jobs are there, businesses are hiring, it's not the worse economy since Herbert Hoover was president. Remember Jimmy Carter? Carter had the worst economy since Herbert Hoover.
Liberals are convinced that saying it over and over will wipe away the memory of Jimmy Carter and that people will believe it. What Democrats don't recognize is that people are smart enough to realize that the choices made in their life affected whether or not they are better off today than they were four years ago. Yes, some people are worse off, but the majority of people are doing better today than they were then. People are doing better it has little to do with Clinton, Bush, or Kerry. People are doing better because they worked towards and earned a better life. Some let go of their health insurance for a better job. Yeah, they lost that healthcare coverage, and gained a new coverage in their new employment.
Most people are happy with their situation as it is today. Yet, listening to the Democrats, you'd think that elderly people are eating dog food. As in the eighties, the Democrats will use this argument to portray America as a country filled with greed and evil Republicanism, yet, Democrats won't explain why elderly people will buy the more expensive dog food, than cheaper human food. Expect this around November, especially as we near the holidays.
If the Democrats were right about the war in Iraq, we fought the war for oil. Yet, gas prices continued to rise. I guess we blew it all up when we went there.
We aren't supposed to question Kerry's service, on the other hand, we keep hearing about G.W's service in the National Guard. The hypocrisy is undeniable and the average Joe understands what is going on. Only the politically blind believe that there is something there.
And so what if GW didn't take his physical, what does that mean? I am quite certain that there were many people during the Vietnam era who were anxious to take the Physical exam and hoping to fail it. Had GW really wanted out of the service he could have FAILED the exam. Not taking the exam only meant that he was eligible to continue his service in the Guard, not escape it.
While liberals continue to demand that Bush answer charges based completely around forged documents, the majority of people realize the insanity of the situation. What if I forged documents proving that you cheated on your spouses. Do you really believe that your spouse will just shrug off the forgery and demand that you answer the charges levied against you? Does anybody really believe that? Yet, that is what we are getting from liberals, a demand that Bush answer charges that are proven false before they even got started.
It's not that Bush is a great president, it's that the left has gone off the deep end. In their political blindness, they anxiously jump off any cliff, in order to prove how much they hate Bush. Fact is, their lunacy has made George W. Bush out to be a far greater president than he actually is. Compare Bush too Reagan, Bush is inferior. But watching liberals act, you'd think George W. is the greatest thing since sliced bread.
This election isn't a resounding approval of a job well done by the president. It's a clear rejection of the lunacy that the left has become. The Democrat party has completely become comprised of wackos. Yes, it is the average Democrat voter that has lost his mind.
I want to put this out there before the news gets any better, or worse. I firmly believe that states such as Washington, Oregon, California, New York, Michigan, Iowa, Ohio, Minnesota, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, Vermont, and Florida will be in the Bush column. People won't vote for lunatics.
