But I didn't look at what the blogosphere said after that. I didn't even watch the folks down in spin alley hit the airwaves. I didn't even look to see if Wonkette was going to eat marshmellows, or whatever that stupid comment she made about Cheney was. No, I vanished and turned on the Yankee game. Yanks won 8-4 and went on to finish of the Twins on Saturday.

Oh sure I looked at the web a little, just not the blogosphere. I looked at MSNBC's poll results and began to question it. Just seemed odd that Bush does so much better and yet, they got similiar results as prior polls, even though other polls didn't .

I did recieve comments claiming that Bush was wired. Liberals are now accusing Bush of "cheating". Big suprise here. Like I said, nobody see's things more black and white than liberals do. No matter what a Democrat does, whether it's rampaging through GOP headquarters or Voter fraud, it good. Everything and anything is fine and dandy as long as it's a Democrat does it. For more examples of attempted cheating by liberals click here , here, here, here, here, and here.

While no matter what a Republican does, its to be ridiculed, belittled, criticized. It does not matter how intelligent the Republican is, nor what he accomplishes, he's too be called stupid. Like Quayle, Reagan, and Winston Churchill, President Bush is being called stupid. Yes, this is the same guy who was so much smarter than any Democrat, that he outsmarted them enough to "steal an election" from "intelligent people" who were cheating. Exactly who is stupid again?

But like the the conservatives complaining about Kerry's pen the liberals who are crying about Bush being wired on Friday night are admitting defeat. It's like watching a team get beat on the football field all through the game but in the end, blame the refs for the loss. Who cares if Kerry had a pen, Bush still should have been able to answer the questions and same thing with Kerry. So what if Bush had a wire? Couldn't Kerry stand on his beliefs? I guess not.

But I there was one moment in the debate that may have decided this election. It was the moment that Bush took command of the election. It was the moment that Bush demanded extra time in the debate. That moment reminded me of a scene straight out of 'Swing Kids when a crippled Frank Whaley stood up in the club and chastised not only the patrons, but the entire country of Germany. It was a powerful moment. It was the moment that President Bush chastised his fellow countrymen for getting weak kneed. He took the opportunity to tell the country to get their minds right, that what we did in Iraq was the right thing to do. Bush stood his ground.

If, by now, you haven't figured out what I am referring to then I'll give you the exchange.

KERRY: "Now, I'm going to add 40,000 active duty forces to the military, and I'm going to make people feel good about being safe in our military, and not overextended, because I'm going to run a foreign policy that actually does what President Reagan did, President Eisenhower did, and others.

We're going to build alliances. We're not going to go unilaterally. We're not going to go alone like this president did."

GIBSON: "Mr. President, let's extend for a minute..."

BUSH: "Let me just -- I've got to answer this. "

GIBSON: "Exactly. And with Reservists being held on duty..."

(CROSSTALK)

BUSH: "Let me answer what he just said, about around the world."

GIBSON: "Well, I want to get into the issue of the back-door draft..."

BUSH: "You tell Tony Blair we're going alone. Tell Tony Blair we're going alone. Tell Silvio Berlusconi we're going alone. Tell Aleksander Kwasniewski of Poland we're going alone."

"There are 30 countries there. It denigrates an alliance to say we're going alone, to discount their sacrifices. You cannot lead an alliance if you say, you know, you're going alone. And people listen. They're sacrificing with us."

That's exactly right Mr. President. We DID build a coalition, we did go to the U.N. We did go to Senators Kerry and Edwards and got their approval. Why were they so easily misled? Weren't they doing their job? Weren't they reading the intelligence breifings in a post 9-11 world? Can Kerry/Edwards be trusted to serve another term in the senate if they are more preoccupied with vactions than they are with intelligence briefings?

Since day 1, liberals have been for allowing Saddam Hussien keeping his abusive stranglehold over the citizens of Iraq. They were at ease as Saddam was a threat to the United States. They were perfectly okay with a President bombing dropping bombs in the Iraqi capital as long as it served to be a distraction from impeachment hearings.

If it were up to the liberals, Saddam would still be slaughtering innocent victims while we occassionally killed "innocent civilians". When it comes to liberals, it's okay to kill innocent children in Iraq, if it helps a Democrat hold onto his presidency.

But if it were up to John Kerry and John Edwards, as long as the President is a Republican, then the civil war would not be worth the cost. As I pointed out in an earlier post If a little over a thousand lives was not worth the war then what would they way about the Civil War (Loss of life - 558,052) in which we freed the slaves and the Second World War (Loss of life - 407,316) in which we helped free Jews and ended the holocaust.

Don't you think that was a bit more challenging? Is it just wars that we win that the Senator approves of? What would Senator Kerry, Senator Edwards, and the rest of these liberals say during the civil war when it looked like the Union was going to lose? What would they have said on June 7, 1944, the day after D-Day? Would they have called the war a failure then?

Look inside yourself, is there ANY DOUBT that we are going to accomplish our goals in Iraq and Afghanistan? There was far more reason to doubt other wars that we have been involved in. Fortunately we haven't encountered weak leaders during more trying times. Fortunately we never had the Neville Chamberlains and the John Kerrys of the world running our country at the worst times; during times of war.

So when Bush hears people such as the absentee senators criticizing the our actions in Iraq, I can understand why he took the gloves off, smacked Kerry across the face and said "What's wrong with you boy?" Iraq is not a quagmire and you liberals crying because Bush "yelled" sound like the little child crying to his momma because daddy "spanked you".

And did you need anymore proof that liberals waste valuable oxygen that would better serve a suffocating butterfly in Honduras? Take the back door draft rumor flying around the net. When you go to a liberal blog and you see them talking about the coming draft, remember, you are reading an idiot's POV. Everybody, except for the stupid people, knows that it's the Democrats are proposing the bill to draft people. And everybody knows, including the liars who spread this dishonesty, that the only reason the Democrats are doing this is for political positioning. Next time you hear this line, remind the people spreading the lie that either they are lying or just stupid.

Kerry also looked right into the camera and said that he would not raise the taxes on the middle class. Why do we believe him? Is it because he has some voting record to stand on? Is it because he can look into the camera with his paleface and say he wouldn't? Of course we can trust him because Democrats NEVER raise taxes on the middle class.

When discussing his views on abortion in the last debate Kerry said he was for: "making certain that you don't deny a poor person the right to be able to have whatever the constitution affords them if they can't afford it otherwise." Does this mean that after cutting our taxes, giving us jobs, eliminating the deficit, and providing us with free health care, will he give us all (except those making over $200K of course) free guns so we can exercise our 2nd amendment rights?---Joe Wills

Gun ownership is your right, demand the government provide your firearm TODAY!

Is it just me or is the MSNBC online poll artificially high and abnormally steady?

It seems that it's increasing steadily at 4,000 votes a minute. That does not seem right, it should be steadily going down, especially when the website belongs to the lowest rated Snoozechannel.

Something else bothers me about this poll. The percentage hasn't changed. It's consistently 69% Kerry 31% Bush. I don't remember ever seeing a poll where it stayed steady the entire night. I am willing to bet that Bush comes on strong later, when the polling slows down.

Sunday, Oct. 10

Cleveland at Pittsburgh -
Pittsburgh pounds the dawgs.
AV~Picks Steelers 28 Dawgs 13 (41)
Final Score Steelers 34 Dawgs 23 (57)
Week Record 1-0
Season Record 32-29-

Detroit at Atlanta -
Burdz gut the roar out of Lions.
AV~Picks Burdz 31 Meows 17 (48)
Final Score Lions 17 Burdz 10 (27)
Week Record 1-1
Season Record 32-30

Miami at New England -
Fins shock world, stop Pats streak
AV~Picks Miami Eels 17 Pats 16 (33)
Final Score Pats 24 Fins 10 (34)
Week Record 1-2
Season Record 32-31

Minnesota at Houston -
Vikings invades Houston, steal cattle, dignity.
AV~Picks Vikes 38 Houston 14 (52)
Final Score Vikes 34 Texans 28 (62)
Week Record 2-2
Season Record 33-31

N.Y. Giants at Dallas -
Boize are getting warmed up
Boize 27 Army Ants 20 (47)
Final Score Army Ants 26 Boize 10 (36)
Week Record 2-3
Season Record 33-32

Oakland at Indianapolis -
Colts gallop all over the Raiduhs
AV~Picks Galloping Colts 45 Raiduhs 19 (64)
Final Score Colts 35 Raiduhs 14 (49)
Week Record 3-3
Season Record 34-32

Tampa Bay at New Orleans -
Finally! A team that can make the Buccs look good
AV~Picks Buccs 35 Saints 10 (45)
Final Score Buccs 20 Saints 17 (37)
Week Record 4-3
Season Record 35-32

Buffalo at N.Y. Jets -
Jets keep flying
AV~Picks Jets 34 Bills 24 (58)
Final Score Jets 16 Bills 14 (30)
Week Record 5-3
Season Record 36-32

Jacksonville at San Diego -
Jags D cause blackout in San Diego
AV~Picks Jags 27 Blackout 6 (33)
Final Score Bolts 34 Jags 21 (55)
Week Record 5-4
Season Record 36-33

Arizona at San Francisco -
Finally, a team that makes Arizona look good!
AV~Picks Cardz 27 Niners 7 (34)
Final Score Niners 31 Cardz 28 (59)
Week Record 5-5
Season Record 36-34

Carolina at Denver -
Rested Catz gets Plummered
AV~Picks Broncs 35 Catz 20 (55)
Final Score Broncs 20 Catz 17 (37)
Week Record 6-5
Season Record 37-34

St. Louis at Seattle -
Burdz shut down Lambs
AV~Picks Burdz 26 Rams 17 (43)
Final Score Rams 33 Burdz 27 (60)
Week Record 6-6
Season Record 37-35

Baltimore at Washington
Skins shoot down Ravens
AV~Picks Skins 17 Ravens 14 (31)
Final Score Ravens 17 Skins 10 (27)
Week Record 6-7
Season Record 37-36

Monday, Oct. 4
Tennessee at Green Bay -
Two teams going south
AV~Picks Packers 21 Titans 13 (34)
Final Score Titans 48 Packed 27 (75)
Week Record 6-8
Season Record 37-37

Open date: Chicago, Cincinnati, Kansas City, Philadelphia

When I first saw the ads for this show I couldn't believe my eyes. Perhaps it's the name of the show but whatever the reason, I thought the show was just going to be scraping the bottom of the gutter sewer.

Turns out, the show is pretty good. They took a lazy, animal rights activist liberal woman and moved her into a home with a southern, conservative, clean patriotic hunter. What a mismatch. They took his wife and moved her in with her husband. What a mismatch.

It was too funny watching how liberals act at home. Pretty much like I expected from liberals. The liberal guy got mad because his new wife made him put up an American flag. It went "against" his "every beliefs". I guess he doesn't see where America has made the world a better place.

As for the liberal lady, it turns out that she believes in God. Although I doubt she went to church very often since she slept in everyday. Anyway, when she saw the stuffed animals on the wall, she began to cry feeling "sorry that the animals had too die". I got news for her, someday, she too will die.

But in typical liberal fashion, when the lib lady found out that the conservative mom put a little discipline (not spanking) in her liberal daughter, the lib mom appeared to show a sense of violence. Typical liberals, alway trying to force their ways onto the rest of us but how dare anybody place any sense of standard onto them.

You know the real problem with liberals? They don't have a sense of importance. They think that they have to "change the world", or make some sort of difference to justify their own lives. The fact is, the world is already a perfect place, it's mankind that screws it up by thinking the government can fix that which is not broke.

The Draft

Let's get real already, the only reason the draft is even on the table is because DEMOCRATS WANT TO PASS THE DRAFT. If they didn't want it to pass, then why did they propose it? Representative Charles Rangel (D-NY) sponsered the bill to reinstate the draft. For liberals to act like an extreme partisan such as Democrat Charles Rangel is proposing the draft as some sort of favor to Republican President is dishonest a lie. To describe this as anything else isn't partisan, it's classless. The leftist that continue to perpertrate the lie know better.

While GOP Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfield says there is no need for a draft, Democrat Charles Rangel disagrees Click it and find the truth to this issue.

That's it?

Out of the whole entire debate, the left, led by the partisan press, cry over Cheney's remarks that he never met John Edwards. Turns out that Cheney met Edwards at a prayer breakfast and on one other occassion during Liz Dole's inauguration. I don't understand why the press is going gaga over this, all they are accomplishing is pointing out that Senator Edwards never met Cheney in the Senate. Could it be that they are accidentally pointing out that Edwards missed alot of days in the senate.

But what the press and other liberals did was help bring down the importance of Edwards by making him insignificant. What difference was Edwards when he couldn't even show up to the Senate? Yes Cheney was mistaken, but don't remind the people that Edwards missed alot of days. Also, don't call him a liar, you might accidentally convince a lot of liberals to vote for him.

And the Naziesque behavior continues to emanate from the left. You wonder why I think it's a mental disease that has engulfed the entire left? That it's not just a handful of Democrats who've lost their minds but the whole party? It's ridiculous, but as I have stated just moments again, they are willing to perpetrate a lie, knowing it's a lie, in order to regain power. It's a self esteem issue for them, they lack a total sense of importance. Which is why they put on their brownshirts 'for the greater good storming into and ransacking Republican headquarters in Milwaukee and also in Orlando. With a little more practice I am sure that these liberals will be able to storm into buildings with the same swiftness as the Nazi party when they would storm into Synagogues, nightclubs, and Jewish nieghborhoods. Hiel Kerry!

VOTE REPUBLICAN - BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT THE LUNATICS RUNNING THE ASYLUM

Having failed to make a dent in the first Presidential debate, John Kerry's latest hope for closing the gap fell on the shoulders of boy wonder John Edwards. Unfortunately for John Edwards, he was greeted by a man who while serving in the Whitehouse, spent more time in the Senate than Edwards.

The crushing blow came when Vice President Cheney nailed the absentee Senator with this line...

CHENEY: And Senator, frankly, you have a record in the Senate that's not very distinguished. You've missed 33 out of 36 meetings in the Judiciary Committee, almost 70 percent of the meetings of the Intelligence Committee.

You've missed a lot of key votes: on tax policy, on energy, on Medicare reform.

Your hometown newspaper has taken to calling you "Senator Gone." You've got one of the worst attendance records in the United States Senate.

Now, in my capacity as vice president, I am the president of Senate, the presiding officer. I'm up in the Senate most Tuesdays when they're in session.

The first time I ever met you was when you walked on the stage tonight.

But this exchange between the two pointed out the clear differences between the two sides.

CHENEY: They're doing a superb job. And for you to demean their sacrifices strikes me as...

EDWARDS: Oh, I'm not...

CHENEY: ... as beyond...

EDWARDS: I'm not demeaning...

CHENEY: It is indeed. You suggested...

EDWARDS: No, sir, I did not...

CHENEY: ... somehow they shouldn't count, because you want to be able to say that the Americans are taking 90 percent of the sacrifice. You cannot succeed in this effort if you're not willing to recognize the enormous contribution the Iraqis are increasingly making to their own future.

Perhaps Dick Cheney looked more presidential than all of them. Maybe it was Dick Cheney who should be headlining the tour, sitting nose to nose with the other absentee Senator. After watching Dick Cheney sit at that table, ripping the other guy to shred, I am glad that George W. Bush is our president. We know Dick Cheney knows what's going on, we know that both Senators are too busy vacationing to know what's going on.

The poll numbers won't change much, but I got a sense of security with Dick Cheney in the Whitehouse. I'm sure the American public got much of the same sense.

I seriously doubt that they will denounce this attempt at stopping a mere act of education when a teacher posted a picture of the forty-three presidents of America in her classroom. It seems as though some parents are so convinced that John Kerry already won the election and is the next president of the United States. Convinved enough that they demanded John Kerry's picture be posted too. When the teacher refused, it was demanded that she turn in her keys.

John Kerry said Thursday night that
he never called Bush a liar

But his official website does on February 2, 2004

It's these unreasonable acts of political discourse that make the Democrat party as a whole just too scary to be elected. It doesn't stop with just a handful of over active Democratic zealots, it also is seen in party allies such as Dan Ra^ther forging documents and Mythical Moore and his fictiomentary 'Propaganda 9-11'.

Unfortunately it doesn't stop there for the left, where it really gets incredibly scary is the tyrannical things the left want to do. Remember the Patriot act? Yes, it's true that many of our friends on the left oppose the Patriot act now, but during its passage all Senate Democrats except for two voted for it. Not only did Senator Kerry vote for the bill, he helped write it. What's so troubling about Democrats is that during the passage of the Patriot Act, they insisted that the Patriot Act did not go far enough complaining that it did not include National ID cards. Howard Dean was among those supporters of intrusive government.

And wasn't it ALGORE that wanted to give 'Hollywood 6 months to clean up their act or else' And what is Senator Kerry's view on the Patriot Act? Well according to the Senator on Thursday night, the Patriot act does not do enough. The Senator stated "95 percent of the containers that come into the ports, right here in Florida, are not inspected. Civilians get onto aircraft, and their luggage is X-rayed, but the cargo hold is not X- rayed."

Now we find out that John Kerry wants Iran to have nukes Click here to find out why. One astute reader noted that while the Senator is busy giving hostile countries nuclear technology, he's also warned us in the Thursday night debate the following "And we're even developing ground penetrating nuclear bombs for use in the War on Terror. I'll scrap that program IMMEDIATELY and use the money more wisely." Is that so senator? How is that so, by giving the Iranian nuclear technology while giving the American Public National ID Cards?

Is it possible that the Senator will only prolong the war on terrorism in order to pass legislation infringing on the freedom of the American people with their blessing?

By they way, have you ever noticed that nobody sees things more black and white than our friends on the left do? Anything that a liberal Democrat does is perfect, no matter what it is {White} while anything that a conservative Republican does is evil and wrong, no matter what it is{Black}?

Anyway, I couldn't believe it. I couldn't believe my ears as I listened to my fellow Republicans slam Bush after the first presidential debate. I understand you think he's next to God but he really isn't. You got the real Bush on Thursday night and were suprised by him. Was he really so different Thursday night then he was during his acceptance speech? And don't tell me how tired he was, I know he's tired, he's the President.

This is going to be a real shocker to you Republicans who think Bush looked terrible during that first debate, but I got to tell you, He isn't the most eloquent speaker. Where have you folks been?

One thing that is being missed by my fellow conservatives is that the Democrats are betting everything on their view that the American public is stupid. The American public is not stupid. They do realize what's at stake, they do realize that the Senator isn't straight forward. They do realize that Kerry IS the anti-Iraq candidate while Bush is the pro-Iraq candidate. Kerry, has only given credibilty to Bush's decision to take out Hussien. John Kerry admitted that we did the right thing with Iraq. Everything the Democrat party has been saying about Bush the entire time has been flushed down the John by Kerry. Bush knew he did the right thing, and now we know he did the right thing. Thank you Senator Kerry.

Immediately after the debates in 2000, the consensus was that ALGORE had won. After each debate, the numbers would show a clear victory for ALGORE. Yet, ALGORE did not get the lead he expected from the debates. Gore supposedly won, but what good is it to win the debates, if you do not convince your audience to vote for you? ALGORE didn't do it, niether did John Kerry. In fact, I want to ask you to think back to the debates and tell me, after seeing them side by side, Who would you ra^ther have a beer with? Who would you ra^ther watch the superbowl with? Bush might have looked terrible, but I'd ra^ther have a beer with Bush, I'd ra^ther watch the Superbowl with Bush, I'd ra^ther vote for Bush. I trust Bush over Kerry, so will the American public.

It's that simple, Kerry came off as being fake, unbelieveable, like the high school Barbie who will smile through anything, yet doesn't treat people with respect. John Kerry just looked fake. That smile Kerry had really disturbed me, it was just fake.

But let's get to the substance of the debate....since you folks are too busy whining over your new discovery that Bush has speech problems. Let's take a serious look at Kerry's speech problems.

"The president hasn't put one nickel, not one nickel into the effort to fix some of our tunnels and bridges and most exposed subway systems. That's why they had to close down the subway in New York when the Republican Convention was there. We hadn't done the work that ought to be done.

The president -- 95 percent of the containers that come into the ports, right here in Florida, are not inspected. Civilians get onto aircraft, and their luggage is X-rayed, but the cargo hold is not X- rayed."---- Senator Kerry, are you proposing a police state?

"When I was in a rope line just the other day, coming out here from Wisconsin, a couple of young returnees were in the line, one active duty, one from the Guard. And they both looked at me and said: We need you. You've got to help us over there."----Oh Senator, you wait in rope lines? Well, maybe next time I'll be in line with you.

"And what we need now is a president who understands how to bring these other countries together to recognize their stakes in this. They do have stakes in it. They've always had stakes in it."-----I'm glad you feel that way Senator, so what do you have to say about our current allies?

"But you can't tell me that when the most troops any other country has on the ground is Great Britain, with 8,300, and below that the four others are below 4,000, and below that, there isn't anybody out of the hundreds, that we have a genuine coalition to get this job done." So Senator, are you saying that our current allies are unimportant? With your election, will they withdraw? Well what else do you have to say about coalition building?

"We could have bilateral talks with Kim Jong Il. And we can get those weapons at the same time as we get China. Because China has an interest in the outcome, too."-----So you won't build a coalition in dealing with North Korea? Would you deal with them unilaterally if necessary?

"It [IRAQ] was a threat. That's not the issue. The issue is what you do about it."-----------Senator Kerry, thank you for admitting that Iraq was a threat, and we did do something about it instead of waiting around for Iraq to become a much bigger threat.