 |
Monday, September 20, 2004
Arguments for.....
Though I am for free speech I do think that it is important us to have sensible speech legislation. We can not continue to allow organizations such as Swift Boat Veterans and Moveon.org to have unchecked free speech. We put our children at risk everyday by allowing assault speech on the streets.
When they come home, they are subjected to hate speech from cruel newscasters, hence the title of the bill
This is not about infringing on your free speech, it's about sensible free speech laws. We would follow similiar laws on the books which will guide who should not be allowed to have speech, much less assault speech.
¤In 1998, hurt speech speech was used to hurt Monica's feelings, as well as the well known damage to the first family. In Iraq, nobody accused the President of sexual immorality. 16 cases of hurt speech and 0 cases of assault speech in Cuba, 13 cases of hurt speech and 2 assault speeches in North Korea. 16 cases of hurt speech and 1 case of assault speech in Canada, while there were 29,685 cases of hurt speech and 9390 cases of assault speech in the United States.
¤Homes that have speech are 22 times more likely to be used in domestic arguments, while hate speech notes often accompany suicide-related thoughts. When someone is home, a hurt words such as 'get out' often don't have the same impact as assault speech words such as "move an inch and I shoot. Only two percent of criminals overcome the psychological impact of assault speech during crimes.
¤A study that compared 26 industrialized countries reported that the unintentional hurt feelings rate for children 0-14 is nine times higher in the U.S. than in the other 25 countries combined.
¤During 1999, 52% of all free speech victims under 18 in the U.S. were hurt by assault speech. In 1998, a total of 3,792 Americans ages 19 or under cried because of hurt speech, assault speech and mean thoughts. For every child devastated by assault speech, four are hurt by hurt speech.
Millions of children are subjected to hurt speech in the classroom, while teacher take a potty break. How can our children even learn in the classroom with hurt speech so rampant?
And if that is not enough, many children are forced to walk home or ride the bus with a distracted driver. This is were unmonitered speech turns into assault speech. Many children come home crying because they were subjected to assault speech. What's worse is that assault speech leads to even more violent behaviour. Our children are becoming addicted to assault speech at an alarming rate and school suspension have risen 33% since 1943. This is mostly due to fighting which sprung up from assault speech.
We cannot allow Dan Rather and other assault speech addicts corrupt the minds of our children. We are seeing forged test on the rise. Children in states that the SBVFT Ads were played are now questioning whether or not their parents graduated high school, and just last week, BobInNY spanked his son because his son called him 'Hitler' after watching a Moveon.org commercial on the internet.
How It Works
McCain Fiengold did not do enough, we must do more for our children, we can do better!" Assault speech ban to include five day "cooling off" period. All speech should be applied for through the FBI. When you feel like saying something, you submit it to the FBI assault speech division where it will be analyzed and a background check will be done to see if you have abused speech and/or prohibited from owning a gun. Of course, if you weren't responsible enough to own a gun, why would you be responsible enough to have speech?
After five days, your speech is either approved or rejected. If rejected, you may submit speech two more times. The three strikes and your out rule is enforced. If your speech is approved then you may take the speech and use it at your free will, however, it will expire 30 days after approval.
This is not about infringing on anybodies right to free speech, but we don't believe that a nine year old should use a bazooka of assault speech in his backyard either. If parents can not raise their children properly, then the government needs to do something.
All speech will have the same restrictions as gun laws.
Source of information
Posted at 10:23 pm by Avman
| Permalink
Sunday, September 19, 2004
I going to be open minded
I am going to try something that's very difficult for me to do. Understand that as a conservative it's very hard for me to reach out, I was born bigoted. Despite my silver spoon, Neanderthal, trailer park, hateful Republican upbringing, I'm going to try to be open-minded. I want to understand sexual perverseness freedom.
Let's start with necrophilia, after all, it seems to be a popular California liberal tradition. What is it about necrophilia that one would try it? Is it the eerily cold flesh? Is it the blurry eyes? Is it the Wrigley maggots?
What about rapist? Being a bigot, I don't understand rapist either. I know, I know, how do I know I'm not a rapist until I try it, but I'll continue to be bigoted in my Neanderthal way. I just don't understand it. Tell me, why should I accept that sexual freedom?
What is it about child molestation? Is it the hairless skin? Is it the S&M with out the leather whips that makes this activity so attractive?
I couldn't possibly get into the whole farm thing; I'm not even going to get into the discussion of that. It's true, I'm the biggest beastialiphobe you've ever seen. I've got to draw the line somewhere, and hopefully when we get there, my fellow citizens will join me in standing up against that.
I know it's not the same ballpark but at what point do you think people should stand up for some type of standard? The American public is not Neanderthals, we're not stupid trailer park hicks, we're not elite moralists who wants the government to rule with an iron fist on the bible. We are just common people who are sick of being offended by you leftist on a daily basis.
What you liberals don't understand is that the majority of Americans don't care whether you are gay or not. It's not important to us, it's not important to me. In fact, I'll be so bold to say that it's none of my business if you lead a homosexual lifestyle. I don't care.
Yet, it isn't the public that keeps your lifestyle in our lives, it's you. Nobody cares to peep into your bedroom; it's not our business, quit making it our business.
The public is preached homosexuality in what seems like every movie, television show, album, and news channel. We see pride parades, gay day, and we are told that homosexuals should be accepted in the military. The homosexual community suffers an AIDS epidemic and instead of blaming the activity of unsafe promiscuous sex, we're told it's Ronald Reagan's fault because he didn't mention AIDS to the public for sometime. And today, one of our most sacred values, the institution of marriage is now under fire. It's inescapable. Yet many of us don't complain because we tolerate it. Yes, they make fun of you, they laugh behind your back, but they tolerate you. But let's see how tolerant you are
Why don't we do this, start demanding that Hollywood preach tolerance towards Christianity? We could change their scripts slightly, instead of showing homosexuals being discriminated against by some bigot, show a Christian in his place. The tolerance line could change slightly from "So what? What's wrong with two men in love?" into "So What? What's wrong with a man loving Jesus?"
Instead of Republicans being the butt of jokes, use Democrats once in a while. Let the conservatives dominate Hollywood for awhile. Don't worry, we'd only use it to forward our agenda as much as liberals currently do.
Why don't we organize a straight parade? We could march down the streets, half-naked, celebrating our bodies in all its heterosexual glory. What's wrong with hetero-pride? We could chant "I'm straight, I know it. I'm not afraid to show it!"
Why don't we take over a block in the middle of San Francisco, wave the confederate flag from every building, and let the world know that some people are proud of their southern heritage? No? Why not? Go down to bourbon street, there are a ton of pride flags, and it's tolerated. Couldn't you tolerate hundreds of confederate flags on Haight & Asbury? Do you have a problem tolerating that?
Yet, you expect the majority of Americans to sit back and take the constant barrage of homosexuality. Yes, it offends them, but they understand that this is a free country and allow it to go on. They say nothing about it.
We watched and let it go further and further, but when the laws become irrelevant by one Mayor in San Francisco, then the people begin to wake up. People understand that our laws are instituted for a reason and that reason is to keep order in society. Even I, an anti-government freeper, understand that. Would you have it that a judge in Nebraska throw out every case before him that the perp had beaten up a homosexual, just because he disapproves of homosexuality? You won't respect the laws, yet expect the laws to be respected by others?
And when does the agenda end? Does it end with homosexuals being allowed to marry? Does it include throwing people in jail for hate crimes because they quoted the bible? Should it even end with homosexuality? Should it include a 35 year old's Right to marry a 14 year old? If so, then shouldn't Mary Kay Letourneau be given forgiven? After all, what's wrong with love?
If love is a crime, she's guilty!
Would NAMBLA be excused then? Isn't NAMBLA a variant of homosexuality? Exactly when does the assault on our values stop? For a growing number of people, it stops now.
Listen to Jeff read this post
Posted at 11:10 pm by Avman
| Permalink
Saturday, September 18, 2004
Constitutional Marriage Amendment passes- for now
Despite voter irregularities in New Orleans (see previous post), the One Man One Woman marriage amendment passed in Louisiana. However, New Orleans would not have made much of a difference on this issue. The amendment passed with 79% of the state vote for passage.
No word yet whether Louisiana has been dubbed the 'Hate State' or if there will be a boycott by the gay community on Louisiana. Hopefully any boycott will include not giving campaign donations to Democrat candidates.
Cleo may have won his PSC campaign but he obviously doesn't have the pull with African American votes that he used to have. Fields, known from driving African Americans down to the polls while handing out his 'Vote the Fields Ticket' that contains the names of other Democrats was unable to get the African American community to vote for Winfield. Byron Sharper, who ran against Fields during the last election, won handily.
It is not yet known whether Cleo supported the Marriage Amendment and his supporters voted for it, or if he opposed it and just could not deliver the votes on this issue either. I'm betting that Cleo Fields is just no longer an influential player.
Posted at 10:29 pm by Avman
| Permalink
Louisiana has voting problems
Oops they did it again, they've taken our votes, and screwed it up again. In the city known for its sexual freedom, Mardi Gras, and Superbowls, New Orleans has put itself on the map again. This time, many voters were not allowed to vote during the morning. The did have the opportunity to come back in the evening and vote.
The problem, according to Nola.com is that Elections machines were not in place at 52 voting places in New Orleans when polls opened Saturday for a vote on a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage and numerous important local races.
It looks like Kip Holden is going to be first and Bobby Simpson is in second. The runoff will be in six weeks.
Anyway, I voted. I had a running joke today,
"I'm going to go vote later as a homeless person."
Yeah, it was a bad joke.
¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§
I was out having fun this weekend bloghopping. Yeah, I know, whoopee, but it beats getting a DUI ticket. Anyway, I came across this post from some blogger. As soon as I find it I will post it.
I obviously took this as a sign that he would approve of us conservatives posting sharing this information with other conservatives. You see, it's free speech to know personal information and go to their house and stage a protest. Although I could not participate in a protest, I do wonder if these folks would like to be greeted by a welcome home party.
In all honesty, I do not advocate going to their homes and causing a stir, I'll leave that work to the brownshirts.
Peaceful protest at the residence of John O'Neill, co-author of Unfit for
Truth. O'Neill's charges against John Kerry's Viet Nam service are proven
lies, discredited by the men who served with Kerry.
Saturday, September 18,2004
10:00 am - Noon
2208 Devonshire, Houston, Texas
(corner or Kingston and Devonshire - off Westheimer, between Sheppard and Kirby)
Veterans and military families respond to the attacks on the military record of John Kerry and ALL U.S. veterans. SUPPORT Veterans� rights. STOP the slashing of Veterans� benefits and services. Respect the honor of our military veterans.
Contact
Mark Muhich
Gulf Coast Truth to Power
409-763-0482
MarkMuhich@ev1.net
Doug Peterson
Bay Area New Democrats
281-782-4861
Posted at 10:04 pm by Avman
| Permalink
Friday, September 17, 2004
Go ahead vote your conviction/I-C-B-S
Mark White from Liberty Just in Case pointed out that the latest Gallup Poll. While some polls show Bush with a 10-15 point lead, there are still a plethora of polls for Republicans to be concerned about. Those polls show that this election is still close.
But while I want to keep my fellow Republicans level headed during this wave of good news, I also want to take a moment to point out that there are no credible polls to show John Kerry in the lead. In otherwords, there is absolutely no reason for Democrats to believe that their candidate is going to win.
Go ahead, vote for him
Kerry's going to lose anyway.
The good news for liberals is that they know they are going to lose. Liberals can now cast their vote for a real candidate that espouse their beliefs. Liberals everywhere can vote for Nadar, Socialism, Communism, Fidelism, and LGBT rights. You can even vote for Peltier and help end "environmental racism. Isn't that a great cause worth voting for? Isn't it better than wasting your vote on a guy who intentionally threw the election? Hey, at least your donations made him rich richer!
Your vote for a liberal candidate WILL NOT cost the self admitted war criminal the election. You don't have to throw your values away on a candidate who will. If you are anti-war, you can now vote for the candidate of your choice instead of voting pro-war. You don't have to vote for new wars on compassionate dictators, you can now stand by your principles.
You don't have to vote for out-sourcing - Hienz Ketchup has outsourced a plethora of jobs.
You don't have to vote for capitalism - Hienz has made millions of dollars off the backs of the poor and a vote for Kerry supports that. Why stand for something you don't believe in?
You don't have to support gun ownership - John Kerry has been seen toting guns around at various times in his campaign. Being seen shooting a gun only serves to encourage little children to shoot people. You don't have to support that.
You don't have to support evil doctors - During John Kerry's term, he never pushed forward any legislation that would really socialize healthcare. You don't have to vote for a capitalist healthcare system.
You don't have to vote for Kerry - It's become self evident that the election is over. It is clear that Bush has won. Vote your convictions on November 2.
Shouldn't CBS be renamed ICBS -Internet Caught Bull S***? 
Any questions?
Posted at 12:21 pm by Avman
| Permalink
It's okay to hurt three year olds who voted for Bush the last time.
UPDATED: OTHER SIDE OF STORY
Ever wonder why some of us would oppose Rnold becoming president? Because we open the door for the Daniel Ortega wannabe henchmen to run for the presidency. Though Roger Calero can't be the President of the United States, he still managed to get on the ballot. Roger Calero, born in Nicaragua, is the nominee for the Socialist Workers Party and according to politics1.com - the SWP has evolved into a hardline communist party advocating the brand of authoritarian politics espoused by Cuban President Fidel Castro's style of Marxism.
Also the duo states that they are "standing up to the brutal effects of the deepening global crisis of the capitalist system." Having said that, then I am certain they approve of our embargo over socialist Cuba, after all, Socialist would never need the money of evil capitalist. That evil capitalist country called America should never give money to superior and compassionate socialist countries.
But Democrats have other choices between John Kerry and an ineligible Calero. There are other candidates that also espouse a more dictatorial control over society, even more so than Kerry. Socialist Equality Party is putting up
Bill Van Auken or you could vote for LGBT liberation AND Socialism by casting your vote for John Parker. Left wingers can still vote for Nader. You don't have to waste your vote on John Kerry.
And speekun of Kerry, how ridiculous have liberals become? How many times have we heard that stupid line about the economy being the worst it has been since Herbert Hoover? Had Herbert Hoover been Democrat, they'd complain this was the worst economy ever. Quite frankly, I don't know what they are talking about when I hear how bad the economy is... look at the help wanted section in your local newspaper. Chances are that there is a ton of businesses looking for employees but not a whole lot of ads from people looking for work. The jobs are there, businesses are hiring, it's not the worse economy since Herbert Hoover was president. Remember Jimmy Carter? Carter had the worst economy since Herbert Hoover.
Liberals are convinced that saying it over and over will wipe away the memory of Jimmy Carter and that people will believe it. What Democrats don't recognize is that people are smart enough to realize that the choices made in their life affected whether or not they are better off today than they were four years ago. Yes, some people are worse off, but the majority of people are doing better today than they were then. People are doing better it has little to do with Clinton, Bush, or Kerry. People are doing better because they worked towards and earned a better life. Some let go of their health insurance for a better job. Yeah, they lost that healthcare coverage, and gained a new coverage in their new employment.
Most people are happy with their situation as it is today. Yet, listening to the Democrats, you'd think that elderly people are eating dog food. As in the eighties, the Democrats will use this argument to portray America as a country filled with greed and evil Republicanism, yet, Democrats won't explain why elderly people will buy the more expensive dog food, than cheaper human food. Expect this around November, especially as we near the holidays.
If the Democrats were right about the war in Iraq, we fought the war for oil. Yet, gas prices continued to rise. I guess we blew it all up when we went there.
We aren't supposed to question Kerry's service, on the other hand, we keep hearing about G.W's service in the National Guard. The hypocrisy is undeniable and the average Joe understands what is going on. Only the politically blind believe that there is something there.
And so what if GW didn't take his physical, what does that mean? I am quite certain that there were many people during the Vietnam era who were anxious to take the Physical exam and hoping to fail it. Had GW really wanted out of the service he could have FAILED the exam. Not taking the exam only meant that he was eligible to continue his service in the Guard, not escape it.
While liberals continue to demand that Bush answer charges based completely around forged documents, the majority of people realize the insanity of the situation. What if I forged documents proving that you cheated on your spouses. Do you really believe that your spouse will just shrug off the forgery and demand that you answer the charges levied against you? Does anybody really believe that? Yet, that is what we are getting from liberals, a demand that Bush answer charges that are proven false before they even got started.
It's not that Bush is a great president, it's that the left has gone off the deep end. In their political blindness, they anxiously jump off any cliff, in order to prove how much they hate Bush. Fact is, their lunacy has made George W. Bush out to be a far greater president than he actually is. Compare Bush too Reagan, Bush is inferior. But watching liberals act, you'd think George W. is the greatest thing since sliced bread.
This election isn't a resounding approval of a job well done by the president. It's a clear rejection of the lunacy that the left has become. The Democrat party has completely become comprised of wackos. Yes, it is the average Democrat voter that has lost his mind.
I want to put this out there before the news gets any better, or worse. I firmly believe that states such as Washington, Oregon, California, New York, Michigan, Iowa, Ohio, Minnesota, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, Vermont, and Florida will be in the Bush column. People won't vote for lunatics.
¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤
Posted at 01:29 am by Avman
| Permalink
Wednesday, September 15, 2004
What if they just didn't sell the product to us?
I've thought about lawsuits lately. I've thought of the impact that they are having on our nation. I thought about the lawsuits against the tobacco industry, and the lawsuits against the gun industry. I've thought of the active roll that city and state governments have played in the massive lawsuits. I've thought of the massive people who sue McDonalds because they are massive.
But let's take a different approach. What if McDonalds started to decide who is capable of eating their foods? What would the reaction be then? Would juries then be sensitive to the compassionate side of McDonalds? Would juries then say McDonalds has the right to refuse service to people based on their obesity? But haven't we decided that large corporations can be held responsible even when we are at fault for the malfunction of their product?
In Denham Springs, a city just outside of Baton Rouge, a woman sues Nintendo for death of her son. It didn't matter to the woman that her son spent more time in front of the Nintendo than most of us spend at work. It didn't matter to the oman that her son already had siezures while playing the Nintendo. It did not matter to the woman that she failed to raise her son properly. But what may have mattered is that Nintendo had already put into the user manual a warning that if siezures occur while playing the system, to stop use of system immediately and consult a doctor.
We have seen the idiot warnings. You know, the warnings that only an idiot needs. Like a warning that says not to use a toaster in the bathtub. Or the one that says plastic wrapper is not a part of the toy. Even after idot warnings exist, large companies are sued.
So I think companies ought to take a different approach.
What if the companies refused to sell to certain people. Such as the tobacco industry. What if after the lawsuits, they had taken out a large ad simply stating that because of the lawsuits, Phillip-Morris will no longer sell tobacco products in listed states. What would the reactions of both liberal and conservative smokers then be?
What if the evil gun manufacturers spent and equal amount of money lost due to lawsuits taking out television and radio ads explaining that because listed states believed that guns were responsible for *** deaths in said state, that the gun manufactureres will no longer sell in said states including selling to police, national gaurd, security gaurds? What would the reaction of the public then be?
What if the gun shops required their buyers to become lifetime members of both the NRA and RKBA organizations? Or to have the ten amendments of the constitution memorized? Would the gun owners who insist on more gun legislation approve? What if the gun shops required people to take an oath to loyally support the second amendment before they were allowed to purchase the gun? What if Democrats just made a law that members of the Democrat party can't own a gun? I'd support that measure.
Vote here....
¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤
Blogging has really taken off - noted columnist Michelle Malkin and David Limbaugh have blogs.
If that wasn't enough justification, bloggers continue to lead the fight against Rather hates Bush gate. It seems as if the hate group er lunatics called er 527 organization called Texans forged truth may have a connection in all of this. As more and more people play pajama detective, the more eyes there are on irregularities in the newsroom, and elsewhere. The people naturally find free speech.
¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤
MAJOR CHANGE --- Virtual tie in Illinois
Posted at 11:45 pm by Avman
| Permalink
Though Ivan misses us, it came close enough to make me more sensitive to those in it's path.
Please take moment to wish the Alabama bloggers well.
Sunday, Sep. 19
Carolina at Kansas City -
Possible SB preview? Chiefs start warpath late, chop Panthers
AV~Picks Chiefs 24 Panthers 17 (41)
Final Score Panthers 28 Chiefs 17 (45)
Week Record 0-1
Season Record 7-10
Chicago at Green Bay -
Like Kerry sez, in Lambert field 'Le Bears' win every time. This ain't no Lambert field.
AV~Picks in LAMBEAU FIELD Packers 34 Dabears 16 (50)
Final Score 'Le' Bears 21 Le Packers 10 (31)
Week Record 0-2
Season Record 7-11
Denver at Jacksonville -
Bucking Broncos buck Ivan/Jags
AV~Picks Buckin Broncos 38 Jags 14 (52)
Final Score Jags 7 Broncos 6 (45)
Week Record 0-3
Season Record 7-12
Houston at Detroit -
Lions, Texans, and Beers, oh my! Lions roar.
AV~Picks Lions 31 Texans 20 (51)
Final Score Lions 28 Texans 16 (44)
Week Record 1-3
Season Record 8-12
Indianapolis at Tennessee -
Colts sink the Titanics
AV~Picks Colts 31 Titanics 16 (47)
Final Score Colts 31 Titanics17 (48)
Week Record 2-3
Season Record 9-12
Pittsburgh at Baltimore -
Steelers look good, defeat blackbirds.
AV~Picks Steelers 27 Blackbirds 23 (50)
Final Score Blackbirds 30 Steelers 13 (43)
Week Record 2-4
Season Record 9-13
San Francisco at New Orleans -
Saints own Louisiana, Niners own the Saints.
AV~Picks Niners 23 Saints 22 (45)
Final Score Saints 30 Niners 27 (57)
Week Record 2-5
Season Record 9-14
St. Louis at Atlanta -
Falcons soar, St. Louis gets rammed.
AV~Picks Falcons 26 Rams 13 (39)
Final Score Falcons 34 Rams 17 (51)
Week Record 3-5
Season Record 10-14
Washington at N.Y. Giants -
Redskins tomahawk Army Ants
AV~Picks Skins 28 Army Ants 17 (45)
Final Score Army Ants 20 Skins 14 (34)
Week Record 3-6
Season Record 10-15
Seattle at Tampa Bay -
Tampa Bay put the pew in pewter, Superhawks win.
AV~Picks Superhawks 28 Buccs 16 (44)
Final Score Superhawks 10 Buccs 6 (16)
Week Record 4-6
Season Record 11-15
Buffalo at Oakland -
Big Battle of the Defeateds - Buffalo roams in, raids Oakland.
AV~Picks Bills 21 Raiduhs 13 (34)
Final Score Raiduhs 13 Bills 10 (23)
Week Record 4-7
Season Record 11-16
Cleveland at Dallas -
DaBoize get rollin. Brown-out.
AV~Picks DaBoize 31 Browns 0 (31)
Final Score Da Boize 19 Browns 12 (31)
Week Record 5-7
Season Record 12-16
New England at Arizona -
Patriotic Poker, New England plays cards. Hits jackpot.
AV~Picks Patriots 35 Cards 13 (48)
Final Score Pats 23 Cards 12 (35)
Week Record 6-7
Season Record 13-16
N.Y. Jets at San Diego -
Jets fly high over bolts
AV~Picks Jets 21 Bolts 10 (31)
Final Score Jets 34 Bolts 28 (62)
Week Record 7-7
Season Record 14-16
Miami at Cincinnati -
Fins in Cincy get stormed.
AV~Picks Bengals 35 Fins 14 (49)
Final Score Bengals 16 Fins 13 (29)
Week Record 8-7
Season Record 15-16
Monday, Sep. 20
Minnesota at Philadelphia -
Vikes pillage Philadelphia.
AV~Picks Vikes 41 Eagles 28 (69)
Final Score Eagles 27 Vikes 16 (43)
Week Record 8-8
Season Record 15-17
Posted at 09:49 pm by Avman
| Permalink
Tuesday, September 14, 2004
Extreme Christian Republicanism is Rampant in California
If you haven't heard, the Dan Ra ther story was busted wide open by this True American Hero
While driving home tonight, I noticed that the other side of the interstate was jammed packed with people fleeing the wrath of Ivan. I thought to myself - Why am I driving east when everybody is driving west? I must be going crazy, next thing you know, I'll be voting for a Democrat. It's nuts out here, people are buying up things left and right from the store and my gawd, I left 20 minutes early for work and still ended up late.
-note sarcasm-
We knew this was coming the minute Rnold stole the election. Those sneaky extreme christian right-wingers are at it already. It was just a matter of time before they turned the California government into a moralistic Nazi regime. This is the latest, those extremist have passed a law making Necrophilia illegal! 
Rnold - the moralist
This Extreme Christian Republican agenda has gone too far! It's time for people who believe in sexual freedom everywhere too stand up and fight for the rights of EVERY sexual freedom. It's not just gay marriage that is under assault. There are many other sexual freedoms that are currently being denied to fellow Americans by American Nazis!. People are going to jail for loving young consenting men just because their under 18 and their Nazi mommy doesn't approve. The Republicans have invaded their bedrooms.
And now the sexual freedom of necrophiliacs is being infringed upon. If the cadaver doesn't complain, why should the extreme radical christian right? If it's done in the privacy of one's bedroom, or morgue, it's none of our business. Quit invading our private lives!
And what about beastiality? Don't you think animals need lovin too? If it's consentual then HANDS OFF!
Right?
My Computer is about to go to computer heaven. When it takes it's final breath, I will be temporarily unable to blog. It may be overnight, it may be in January. Hopefully, I can buy a new computer soon.
Posted at 10:57 pm by Avman
| Permalink
Monday, September 13, 2004
Stop! Or the terrorist will shoot!
He's beginning to look alot like Smeagol
ALGORE - Reaching for his Pres....idency
He really has gone off the deep end and is dragging the entire party with him. This is what's so troubling with partisan suckups. If their leader loses it, the whole group goes with it. Like lemmings, one jumps off a cliff, they all jump off. It's not just Smeagore losing it....the Democrat party has gone insane with him. I ought to start selling 'Straight Jackets for SmeaGore'. I'd make a killing.
And if I needed a Democrat to validate what I said in my last post, Super Kerry provided the evidence. As I stated, the Democrat solution to fighting terrorism isn't going after terrorist in Middle Eastern countries. Their solution is infringing on the Rights of men. Today the self admitted war criminal had this too say about the expiring assault rifle ban - "Today George Bush made the job of terrorists easier and made the job of America's law enforcement officers harder, and that's just plain wrong,"
Oh geesh, as if terrorist aren't capable of getting assault rifles along with guns with greater fire power already. Does John Kerry think that the assault rifle ban keeps terrorist from getting AK-47's, bombs, and RPG's? John Kerry must have smoked some heavy grass back in the sixties.
He continued on..."Tomorrow, for the first time in 10 years when a killer walks into a gun shop, when a terrorist goes to a gun show somewhere in America, when they want to purchase an AK-47 or some other military assault weapon, they're going to hear one word - `sure.'
WHAT???????
Yeah, the terrorist are suddenly revived because George W. Bush let the assault rifle ban expire. I hope they don't go to a gun show and suddenly get the idea of crashing helicopters into the Superdome. Or worse, the United Nations building. Geesh, John Kerry is sooooo intelligent.
It amazes me how liberals can take the simplest things, complicate them, and then call theirselves "intelligent" after they screwed it up.
John Kerry just helped make my case, liberals think the only way to fight terrorism is to infringe on the Rights of man. No war, just surrender your freedom and everything will be alright. Just let the government protect your every move, but don't fight back. Don't defend yourself. Just depend on your new God- the government- to do everything for you.
But what Democrats refuse to understand, and the majority of Americans do, is that there is nothing that stops a criminal in his tracks like a gun in their face.
�����������������������
Ever notice that at times, you can just look at somebody and tell they are a liberal?
Like that guy who's down at the mall buying a pair of clear sunglasses...
Or that girl who looks like she can kick your tail
Or that guy who looks like he can't.
I was driving down the street and I saw a guy driving a white Volvo wagon. He had a ponytail. Naturally, he had a Kerry/Edwards sticker on the bumper. Thank God the dork was a Kerry/Edwards supporter.
�����������������������
The blog The Politburo Diktat has uncovered some major documents that PROVES JOHN KERRY WAS IN CAMBODIA!!!!. It's imperative that you see these and marvel at what a great leader John Kerry is!
---Thanks to Joe Wills for uncovering such vital information.
Posted at 10:16 pm by Avman
| Permalink
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
