But while I want to keep my fellow Republicans level headed during this wave of good news, I also want to take a moment to point out that there are no credible polls to show John Kerry in the lead. In otherwords, there is absolutely no reason for Democrats to believe that their candidate is going to win.

Go ahead, vote for him
Kerry's going to lose anyway.

The good news for liberals is that they know they are going to lose. Liberals can now cast their vote for a real candidate that espouse their beliefs. Liberals everywhere can vote for Nadar, Socialism, Communism, Fidelism, and LGBT rights. You can even vote for Peltier and help end "environmental racism. Isn't that a great cause worth voting for? Isn't it better than wasting your vote on a guy who intentionally threw the election? Hey, at least your donations made him rich richer!

Your vote for a liberal candidate WILL NOT cost the self admitted war criminal the election. You don't have to throw your values away on a candidate who will. If you are anti-war, you can now vote for the candidate of your choice instead of voting pro-war. You don't have to vote for new wars on compassionate dictators, you can now stand by your principles.

You don't have to vote for out-sourcing - Hienz Ketchup has outsourced a plethora of jobs.

You don't have to vote for capitalism - Hienz has made millions of dollars off the backs of the poor and a vote for Kerry supports that. Why stand for something you don't believe in?

You don't have to support gun ownership - John Kerry has been seen toting guns around at various times in his campaign. Being seen shooting a gun only serves to encourage little children to shoot people. You don't have to support that.

You don't have to support evil doctors - During John Kerry's term, he never pushed forward any legislation that would really socialize healthcare. You don't have to vote for a capitalist healthcare system.

You don't have to vote for Kerry - It's become self evident that the election is over. It is clear that Bush has won. Vote your convictions on November 2.

Shouldn't CBS be renamed ICBS -Internet Caught Bull S***?

Any questions?

It's okay to hurt three year olds who voted for Bush the last time.

UPDATED: OTHER SIDE OF STORY

Ever wonder why some of us would oppose Rnold becoming president? Because we open the door for the Daniel Ortega wannabe henchmen to run for the presidency. Though Roger Calero can't be the President of the United States, he still managed to get on the ballot. Roger Calero, born in Nicaragua, is the nominee for the Socialist Workers Party and according to politics1.com - the SWP has evolved into a hardline communist party advocating the brand of authoritarian politics espoused by Cuban President Fidel Castro's style of Marxism.

Also the duo states that they are "standing up to the brutal effects of the deepening global crisis of the capitalist system." Having said that, then I am certain they approve of our embargo over socialist Cuba, after all, Socialist would never need the money of evil capitalist. That evil capitalist country called America should never give money to superior and compassionate socialist countries.

But Democrats have other choices between John Kerry and an ineligible Calero. There are other candidates that also espouse a more dictatorial control over society, even more so than Kerry. Socialist Equality Party is putting up Bill Van Auken or you could vote for LGBT liberation AND Socialism by casting your vote for John Parker. Left wingers can still vote for Nader. You don't have to waste your vote on John Kerry.

And speekun of Kerry, how ridiculous have liberals become? How many times have we heard that stupid line about the economy being the worst it has been since Herbert Hoover? Had Herbert Hoover been Democrat, they'd complain this was the worst economy ever. Quite frankly, I don't know what they are talking about when I hear how bad the economy is... look at the help wanted section in your local newspaper. Chances are that there is a ton of businesses looking for employees but not a whole lot of ads from people looking for work. The jobs are there, businesses are hiring, it's not the worse economy since Herbert Hoover was president. Remember Jimmy Carter? Carter had the worst economy since Herbert Hoover.

Liberals are convinced that saying it over and over will wipe away the memory of Jimmy Carter and that people will believe it. What Democrats don't recognize is that people are smart enough to realize that the choices made in their life affected whether or not they are better off today than they were four years ago. Yes, some people are worse off, but the majority of people are doing better today than they were then. People are doing better it has little to do with Clinton, Bush, or Kerry. People are doing better because they worked towards and earned a better life. Some let go of their health insurance for a better job. Yeah, they lost that healthcare coverage, and gained a new coverage in their new employment.

Most people are happy with their situation as it is today. Yet, listening to the Democrats, you'd think that elderly people are eating dog food. As in the eighties, the Democrats will use this argument to portray America as a country filled with greed and evil Republicanism, yet, Democrats won't explain why elderly people will buy the more expensive dog food, than cheaper human food. Expect this around November, especially as we near the holidays.

If the Democrats were right about the war in Iraq, we fought the war for oil. Yet, gas prices continued to rise. I guess we blew it all up when we went there.

We aren't supposed to question Kerry's service, on the other hand, we keep hearing about G.W's service in the National Guard. The hypocrisy is undeniable and the average Joe understands what is going on. Only the politically blind believe that there is something there.

And so what if GW didn't take his physical, what does that mean? I am quite certain that there were many people during the Vietnam era who were anxious to take the Physical exam and hoping to fail it. Had GW really wanted out of the service he could have FAILED the exam. Not taking the exam only meant that he was eligible to continue his service in the Guard, not escape it.

While liberals continue to demand that Bush answer charges based completely around forged documents, the majority of people realize the insanity of the situation. What if I forged documents proving that you cheated on your spouses. Do you really believe that your spouse will just shrug off the forgery and demand that you answer the charges levied against you? Does anybody really believe that? Yet, that is what we are getting from liberals, a demand that Bush answer charges that are proven false before they even got started.

It's not that Bush is a great president, it's that the left has gone off the deep end. In their political blindness, they anxiously jump off any cliff, in order to prove how much they hate Bush. Fact is, their lunacy has made George W. Bush out to be a far greater president than he actually is. Compare Bush too Reagan, Bush is inferior. But watching liberals act, you'd think George W. is the greatest thing since sliced bread.

This election isn't a resounding approval of a job well done by the president. It's a clear rejection of the lunacy that the left has become. The Democrat party has completely become comprised of wackos. Yes, it is the average Democrat voter that has lost his mind.

I want to put this out there before the news gets any better, or worse. I firmly believe that states such as Washington, Oregon, California, New York, Michigan, Iowa, Ohio, Minnesota, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, Vermont, and Florida will be in the Bush column. People won't vote for lunatics.

But let's take a different approach. What if McDonalds started to decide who is capable of eating their foods? What would the reaction be then? Would juries then be sensitive to the compassionate side of McDonalds? Would juries then say McDonalds has the right to refuse service to people based on their obesity? But haven't we decided that large corporations can be held responsible even when we are at fault for the malfunction of their product?

In Denham Springs, a city just outside of Baton Rouge, a woman sues Nintendo for death of her son. It didn't matter to the woman that her son spent more time in front of the Nintendo than most of us spend at work. It didn't matter to the oman that her son already had siezures while playing the Nintendo. It did not matter to the woman that she failed to raise her son properly. But what may have mattered is that Nintendo had already put into the user manual a warning that if siezures occur while playing the system, to stop use of system immediately and consult a doctor.

We have seen the idiot warnings. You know, the warnings that only an idiot needs. Like a warning that says not to use a toaster in the bathtub. Or the one that says plastic wrapper is not a part of the toy. Even after idot warnings exist, large companies are sued.

So I think companies ought to take a different approach.

What if the companies refused to sell to certain people. Such as the tobacco industry. What if after the lawsuits, they had taken out a large ad simply stating that because of the lawsuits, Phillip-Morris will no longer sell tobacco products in listed states. What would the reactions of both liberal and conservative smokers then be?

What if the evil gun manufacturers spent and equal amount of money lost due to lawsuits taking out television and radio ads explaining that because listed states believed that guns were responsible for *** deaths in said state, that the gun manufactureres will no longer sell in said states including selling to police, national gaurd, security gaurds? What would the reaction of the public then be?

What if the gun shops required their buyers to become lifetime members of both the NRA and RKBA organizations? Or to have the ten amendments of the constitution memorized? Would the gun owners who insist on more gun legislation approve? What if the gun shops required people to take an oath to loyally support the second amendment before they were allowed to purchase the gun? What if Democrats just made a law that members of the Democrat party can't own a gun? I'd support that measure.

If that wasn't enough justification, bloggers continue to lead the fight against _Ra^the_r hates Bush gate. It seems as if ^the hate group er lunatics called er 527 organization called Texans ^forged truth may have a connection in all of this. As more and more people play pajama detective, the more eyes there are on irregularities in the newsroom, and elsewhere. The people naturally find free speech.

Sunday, Sep. 19

Carolina at Kansas City -
Possible SB preview? Chiefs start warpath late, chop Panthers
AV~Picks Chiefs 24 Panthers 17 (41)
Final Score Panthers 28 Chiefs 17 (45)
Week Record 0-1
Season Record 7-10

Chicago at Green Bay -
Like Kerry sez, in Lambert field 'Le Bears' win every time. This ain't no Lambert field.
AV~Picks in LAMBEAU FIELD Packers 34 Dabears 16 (50)
Final Score 'Le' Bears 21 Le Packers 10 (31)
Week Record 0-2
Season Record 7-11

Denver at Jacksonville -
Bucking Broncos buck Ivan/Jags
AV~Picks Buckin Broncos 38 Jags 14 (52)
Final Score Jags 7 Broncos 6 (45)
Week Record 0-3
Season Record 7-12

Houston at Detroit -
Lions, Texans, and Beers, oh my! Lions roar.
AV~Picks Lions 31 Texans 20 (51)
Final Score Lions 28 Texans 16 (44)
Week Record 1-3
Season Record 8-12

Indianapolis at Tennessee -
Colts sink the Titanics
AV~Picks Colts 31 Titanics 16 (47)
Final Score Colts 31 Titanics17 (48)
Week Record 2-3
Season Record 9-12

Pittsburgh at Baltimore -
Steelers look good, defeat blackbirds.
AV~Picks Steelers 27 Blackbirds 23 (50)
Final Score Blackbirds 30 Steelers 13 (43)
Week Record 2-4
Season Record 9-13

San Francisco at New Orleans -
Saints own Louisiana, Niners own the Saints.
AV~Picks Niners 23 Saints 22 (45)
Final Score Saints 30 Niners 27 (57)
Week Record 2-5
Season Record 9-14

St. Louis at Atlanta -
Falcons soar, St. Louis gets rammed.
AV~Picks Falcons 26 Rams 13 (39)
Final Score Falcons 34 Rams 17 (51)
Week Record 3-5
Season Record 10-14

Washington at N.Y. Giants -
Redskins tomahawk Army Ants
AV~Picks Skins 28 Army Ants 17 (45)
Final Score Army Ants 20 Skins 14 (34)
Week Record 3-6
Season Record 10-15

Seattle at Tampa Bay -
Tampa Bay put the pew in pewter, Superhawks win.
AV~Picks Superhawks 28 Buccs 16 (44)
Final Score Superhawks 10 Buccs 6 (16)
Week Record 4-6
Season Record 11-15

Buffalo at Oakland -
Big Battle of the Defeateds - Buffalo roams in, raids Oakland.
AV~Picks Bills 21 Raiduhs 13 (34)
Final Score Raiduhs 13 Bills 10 (23)
Week Record 4-7
Season Record 11-16

Cleveland at Dallas -
DaBoize get rollin. Brown-out.
AV~Picks DaBoize 31 Browns 0 (31)
Final Score Da Boize 19 Browns 12 (31)
Week Record 5-7
Season Record 12-16

New England at Arizona -
Patriotic Poker, New England plays cards. Hits jackpot.
AV~Picks Patriots 35 Cards 13 (48)
Final Score Pats 23 Cards 12 (35)
Week Record 6-7
Season Record 13-16

N.Y. Jets at San Diego -
Jets fly high over bolts
AV~Picks Jets 21 Bolts 10 (31)
Final Score Jets 34 Bolts 28 (62)
Week Record 7-7
Season Record 14-16

Miami at Cincinnati -
Fins in Cincy get stormed.
AV~Picks Bengals 35 Fins 14 (49)
Final Score Bengals 16 Fins 13 (29)
Week Record 8-7
Season Record 15-16

Monday, Sep. 20 Minnesota at Philadelphia -
Vikes pillage Philadelphia.
AV~Picks Vikes 41 Eagles 28 (69)
Final Score Eagles 27 Vikes 16 (43)
Week Record 8-8
Season Record 15-17

While driving home tonight, I noticed that the other side of the interstate was jammed packed with people fleeing the wrath of Ivan. I thought to myself - Why am I driving east when everybody is driving west? I must be going crazy, next thing you know, I'll be voting for a Democrat. It's nuts out here, people are buying up things left and right from the store and my gawd, I left 20 minutes early for work and still ended up late.

-note sarcasm-

We knew this was coming the minute Rnold stole the election. Those sneaky extreme christian right-wingers are at it already. It was just a matter of time before they turned the California government into a moralistic Nazi regime. This is the latest, those extremist have passed a law making Necrophilia illegal!

Rnold - the moralist

This Extreme Christian Republican agenda has gone too far! It's time for people who believe in sexual freedom everywhere too stand up and fight for the rights of EVERY sexual freedom. It's not just gay marriage that is under assault. There are many other sexual freedoms that are currently being denied to fellow Americans by American Nazis!. People are going to jail for loving young consenting men just because their under 18 and their Nazi mommy doesn't approve. The Republicans have invaded their bedrooms.

And now the sexual freedom of necrophiliacs is being infringed upon. If the cadaver doesn't complain, why should the extreme radical christian right? If it's done in the privacy of one's bedroom, or morgue, it's none of our business. Quit invading our private lives!

And what about beastiality? Don't you think animals need lovin too? If it's consentual then HANDS OFF!

Right?

My Computer is about to go to computer heaven. When it takes it's final breath, I will be temporarily unable to blog. It may be overnight, it may be in January. Hopefully, I can buy a new computer soon.

He's beginning to look alot like Smeagol

ALGORE - Reaching for his Pres....idency

He really has gone off the deep end and is dragging the entire party with him. This is what's so troubling with partisan suckups. If their leader loses it, the whole group goes with it. Like lemmings, one jumps off a cliff, they all jump off. It's not just Smeagore losing it....the Democrat party has gone insane with him. I ought to start selling 'Straight Jackets for SmeaGore'. I'd make a killing.

And if I needed a Democrat to validate what I said in my last post, Super Kerry provided the evidence. As I stated, the Democrat solution to fighting terrorism isn't going after terrorist in Middle Eastern countries. Their solution is infringing on the Rights of men. Today the self admitted war criminal had this too say about the expiring assault rifle ban - "Today George Bush made the job of terrorists easier and made the job of America's law enforcement officers harder, and that's just plain wrong,"

Oh geesh, as if terrorist aren't capable of getting assault rifles along with guns with greater fire power already. Does John Kerry think that the assault rifle ban keeps terrorist from getting AK-47's, bombs, and RPG's? John Kerry must have smoked some heavy grass back in the sixties.

He continued on..."Tomorrow, for the first time in 10 years when a killer walks into a gun shop, when a terrorist goes to a gun show somewhere in America, when they want to purchase an AK-47 or some other military assault weapon, they're going to hear one word - `sure.'

WHAT???????

Yeah, the terrorist are suddenly revived because George W. Bush let the assault rifle ban expire. I hope they don't go to a gun show and suddenly get the idea of crashing helicopters into the Superdome. Or worse, the United Nations building. Geesh, John Kerry is sooooo intelligent.

It amazes me how liberals can take the simplest things, complicate them, and then call theirselves "intelligent" after they screwed it up.

John Kerry just helped make my case, liberals think the only way to fight terrorism is to infringe on the Rights of man. No war, just surrender your freedom and everything will be alright. Just let the government protect your every move, but don't fight back. Don't defend yourself. Just depend on your new God- the government- to do everything for you.

But what Democrats refuse to understand, and the majority of Americans do, is that there is nothing that stops a criminal in his tracks like a gun in their face.

Ever notice that at times, you can just look at somebody and tell they are a liberal?

Like that guy who's down at the mall buying a pair of clear sunglasses...

Or that girl who looks like she can kick your tail

Or that guy who looks like he can't.

I was driving down the street and I saw a guy driving a white Volvo wagon. He had a ponytail. Naturally, he had a Kerry/Edwards sticker on the bumper. Thank God the dork was a Kerry/Edwards supporter.

The blog The Politburo Diktat has uncovered some major documents that PROVES JOHN KERRY WAS IN CAMBODIA!!!!. It's imperative that you see these and marvel at what a great leader John Kerry is!

---Thanks to Joe Wills for uncovering such vital information.

Now, to the point of this post.

This story really burns me -Kerry Hints GOP May Suppress Black Votes

Liberals really need to look at how they treat minorities before they start accusing Republicans of trying to suppress any minorities votes. Speaking of suppressing votes, what about Smeagore who tried to suppress the votes of those risking their lives for this country?

Liberals don't think about minorities until an election year comes up. Then suddenly it's time to go out and get their vote. They get the buses out and literally drag poor minorities down to the polls telling them all along who to vote for. But you never see them going down to the ghettos and actually trying to help minorities during the offseason.

If organizations such as the NAACP were really interested in helping minorities get out of poverty, then why not use the money they received to educate poor minorities about economics? Why not teach minorities in poor neighborhoods financial matters instead of spending money on condoms and midnight basketball?

It's not the "minority vote" that they are so interested in, it's the poor uneducated Democrat vote. If the minority is educated and middle class, then the minority is likely too vote. If the person is Republican then certainly he could afford his own ride down to the polls. The majority of the minorities who need to be taken down to the polls are the ones who had no intention of voting to begin with. They drag down people who don't care enought to pay attention. People who don't pay attention vote Democrat.

But if you don't believe that Democrats think minorities are stupid, then let's take a look at their support of affirmative action. The only reason affirmative action is needed is so that the NAACP and other liberals can reiterate to minorities that they are incapable and too incompetent of playing on a playing field with white people. It isn't designed to help people base on poverty status. If it were, many poor white people would benefit from it and many middle class minorities would not.

The fact of the matter is that minorites are just as capable of competing on a level playing field as white people. But if we started to tell minorities that, then the belief that in government dependency and liberal ideology begins to diminish. When the Democrat party depends on 9 out of 10 blacks voting for their candidates, liberals obviously have a reason to keep blacks down trodden, or at least thinking that they are.

Which explains the entire line about minorities being denied their votes being counted. Liberals know this isn't true. If they really believed it, they would have demanded a full investigation into vote fraud, including cross referencing voters from other states. To hound into the minorities that Republicans infringed on their Right to vote, keeps minorities believing that white people have power over them; that white people are somehow stronger than they are. It reiterates to minorities the belief that Republicans are racist.

That's a double edge sword though. Imagine, being told over and over that your vote didn't count last time, but hopefully it can count this time. This time it WILL count. Does that sound encouraging to you? Does that give you a reason to go vote? Nothing will keep people from the polls as much as being told over and over that you wasted your time and energy going to vote the last time. Nothing creates apathy more than telling people their opinion did not matter when they spoke up.

Let's see just how infuriated minorities are during this next election. I don't believe that the minority community is, at least not enough to get out and vote. But the damage has been done, minorites continue to believe that the white guys keeps them down. Just like the Democrats and the NAACP want them, and need them to think.

Who would have expect such a great gift from such a biased guy? George W. Bush really owes Dan Rather one.

Still who could hardly blame our little Danny boy? After all, the fringe left has become mainstream Democrat party. The poor average Democrat has been so abadoned by the hostile takeover that many are now ashamed to admit that they are Democrats. Liberalism has become such a naughty word, that liberals now refer to theirselves as "moderates"

The last presidential nominee for the Democrats needs some medication to calm down, he still obesses each night over his lost presidency. The left actually cheers for the enemy to defeat our military, they stick a finger down their throats in order to vomit, they actually believe it's going to accomplish something.

They protest the Republican convention and who knows what their message was as they marched through those New York streets? Did they even have a message other than Republicans shouldn't have free speech? The average Kerry voter will say anything, do anything, whatever it takes to get George W. Bush. They'd rape their own grandmother if they thought it would do any good.

So once you see the average Kerry voter as a wacko, then you quickly understand why Dan Rather would throw his entire reputation out the window over a smear piece. It wasn't important to Dan Rather that the information be true, just that it damages George Bush's hopes of getting re-elected. It doesn't matter that more and more people are catching on to the propaganda in the media. It doesn't matter that stars are getting jeered everytime they try to invoke their political message into a show.

What matters is that Bush loses, at any expense. I'm becoming afraid of the left, what's left for them to do? Strap a bomb on and run into a building full of Republicans? They are so caught up in their political blindness that they refuse to see that they are making George W. Bush out to be a far greater president than he actually is. And like suicide bombers, accomplish nothing other than turning people against them.

What's the point of these documents anyway? To say that George W. Bush wasn't a a great pilot? And the point is? Does CBS and Dan Rather think I care whether or not George W. Bush was written up?

So Dan Rather is just the latest leftist willing to risk it all over one election. We appreciate his help. What's sad about this is that professional journalist Dan Rather, was defeated by bloggers, amateur journalist. One such blogger is DefeatJohnJohn.com. And they think Bush is stupid? It's a new day, it's a new world, and journalist who refuse be honest won't last long.

Oh my my, how prophetic those words seem today as the Chicago dictator released plans to have 2,000 surveillance cameras in public places. This is exactly what is so troubling with Democrats getting elected. Their idea of fighting terrorism isn't going to war in countries that aid Muslim extremist. Their idea of fighting terrorism is spying on the average everyday citrizen. Forget freedom under Democrat rule, it doesn't exist, government is responsible for your well being. Don't drink, don't smoke, watch what you eat, don't own a gun, government dictates your healthcare, government should issue national ID cards, and now government should keep video surviellance on you whenever you are in public.

This is what Democrats keep complaining about. They don't like the money being spent over in Iraq, it should be spent over here infringing on the freedom of everyday people under the guise of fighting terrorism. Isn't it obvious that the Democrat leadership isn't the least interested in ending terrorism? If they were, they would have ended Laden's career back when Clinton was president. Those days are so easily forgetten because they don't want it too end. Terrorism provides the excuse needed to infringe on every single one of our liberties.

It's not enough for liberals that our airports are more secure than Fort Knox. No, they think rectal exams are needed as well. They want every port to be treated in the same manner. One doesn't have to believe me, all they have to do is clean out their ears and listen to the Democrats, they are telling you what their goal is.

Wasn't it obvious in 2000 before terrorism was the central issue? Don't people remember that SMEAGORE said if elected President he'd give Holly wood six months to clean up their act. If they didn't SMEAGORE and the federal government was going to force them too. Speekun of SMEAGORE, is he getting worse? I can almost hear those words "My Pre...... sidency".

And what of the Democrat candidate who, instead of standing on his record with truth on his side, decides to silence those who oppose them because they "are liars"? What of the man who couldn't be president who threatened to sue stations that aired ads by private citizens who opposed him. Or did everything he could to keep O'neils' book out of bookstores? And what of his actions over the course of his career meeting with leaders who were hostile to America and the Rights of Men? These aren't acts commited by a freedom lover.

I have been saying all along that this election is going to be a landslide, that Bush was going to pull away after the conventions. This election is almost over, but like every good horror movie, the monster comes back too life. The Republicans need to drive the final nails in the coffin of John Kerry's campaign and with it the Democrat party. It's time to drive the points home. With such a weak candidate, the party is losing ground and people who wouldn't otherwise be, are now open to the idea of voting Republican. It's time too woo those votes with conservative ideology, not patronizing social programs.

We have people in this country who are complaining that America is too imperialistic - offer them a one way ticket to a less imperialistic country, like China.

We have Christians in this country who think that the Democrats stand for Christian values - it's time to wake them up.

We have minorities who believe that they are just as capable of succeeding on their own as Anglos- it's time to tell them that affirmative action confirms just the opposite.

Defeat the Democrats in November, defeat them everywhere.

Yeah, I was a little pissed today, okay alot. I had good reason.
When I got home last night I got a letter saying that I was negligent in an automobile accident on August 23, 2004. They had my name, my truck, my address and they wanted me to send my insurance papers to them.

So around 1 pm I called them and asked them about this accident.

I had some serious questions.
"How bad was the accident?"
Oh my, I was in an accident? I hoped I didn't get hurt...
"How serious was my injuries?"
The lady on the other end informed me that I was okay but I insisted...
"I must have been hurt real bad because I don't even remember the accident."
I tried to jog my memory...
"Where did the accident occur?"
Not remembering the accident, I tried to jog my memory some more and began to ask questions about the area.....then it hit me, what about my poor truck, was it totaled?
"Did I have severe damage to my truck?"
Then I realized I was driving my truck today, so I wondered if this is some trick on me?
"What color was my truck? Does she even know?"
Could she identify my truck or should I make a run for it?
Who was ****** *******(their client)?
Yeah, I was pissed, but wouldn't you be? I'm still pissed.

Another poll shows that Bush is opening up the lead in this years election. This time the poll is an ABC News/Washington Post poll.

So I think it's time to help jump start John Kerry's lagging presidential campaign. One of those ideas is too quit saying "Vietnam War" and just say "When I served in a war". This can do a couple of things for Kerry. First, he can change which war he served in. One day, he could serve in the Vietnam war, then it can be the Cambodian war, and then the Korean war. He could even say he served in the Revolutionary war. It doesn't have to be true, all Kerry has to do is say it, Democrats will believe it, and that would show he's more qualified to serve as President than Bush.

The other benefit of talking about "serving in the war" is that it could mean the war on poverty, drugs, illiteracy, and the war on healthcare. It doesn't have to mean he killed people. He can say that he fought bravely from his nice cushy senate seat. Each week, he can serve in a different war.

º¿º
 º
Claim to have served as a Soviet Spy during the Russian war in the Middle East. Making this claim helps explain his voting record during the 80's and it also gives Kerry the claim that he fought against "Terrorism since the 80's" Again, it does not have to be true. All that is needed is for John Kerry to say it, making Democrats believe it, and thus, makes him qualified to be President.

º¿º
 º

Claim to have health problems which would qualify him as being more understanding to the healthcare needs of the poor. Yeah, John Kerry may be richer than George W. Bush, but having health problems means he feels the pain of sick people. Also, the left can say "How dare you question whether or not Kerry is fit to serve, how uncompassionate it would be to make fun of somebody's (a liberals) health problems". Oh I know they make fun of Cheney and his heart problems, but that's okay, he's a Republican.

He could brag about his Senate record and nobody can question it because the rest of us never served with him. And as for the evil Republicans, well "they never served in the same state with John Kerry, so how will they know?" He can say whatever he wants about his Senate record, and only one person is qualified to question him. If that one person comes out against Kerry.... come on, every one knows that Senator Ted likes adult beverages.

See how safe it is to talk about his Senate record?

He could boast that he is smarter than evil people who rush into war, like that George W. Bush, who after a few short months rushed into war. Or even worse, rushing into war against a country that didn't attack us, only two days after the attack on Pearl Harbor. FDR rushed into war against Germany, John Kerry would never have done that.

Infact, John Kerry should talk about all the freedoms we should give up, in order to be safe. For example, he should remind us, that even after all the new security in the Airports, that America still isn't safe. He should make national id cards a center piece of his campaign. He could argue that the national ID cards makes it easier for government law agencies to track non-American terrorist. It's easier because... if they don't have a card, they are a terrorist.

John Kerry could also remind us that he is from the sixties. For some reason, this makes him qualified. Well, maybe not. But at least he can think it does, and because he thinks it does,

Democrats will believe it.

John Kerry can have a new slogan before the election, I fought for my country before I fought against it."

¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤

It only shows just how much America has changed in the course of two hundred years. I was reminded earlier of another American veteran who fought in a war for America. It was during the American Revolution and many Americans fought and died bravely. One soldier realized that the war wasn't the right war for his country and began to work against the American soldiers.

His name was Benedict Arnold. Back then, he was called a traitor, today, he'd be called a presidential candidate for the Democrat party.

¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤§¤

The Democrats got some great news today, reports from the Middle East confirm what the liberals have been saying all along. Our actions in the Middle East are a disaster for this country. The Americans are losing every where they are fighting, suicide bombings have Americans dug into their trenches. It's going badly for us and we know this because...a Bin Laden Deputy told us so! Democrats cheer! Hope abounds for ya!