The fact that they nearly destroyed the Spotted Owl really disturbs me, but do they really have to go after and intentionally make extinct thousands of species that we don't even know about? It's bad enough George Bush allows this to continue on but now we find out that he's also letting his big oil buddies build a pipeline through the Amazon rain forest.

I've had about enough of Bush, it's time to Impeach him. If the war for oil wasn't enough then maybe building a pipeline through the rain forest is. And to top it off, it's going to cost 20 billion dollars! Instead of spending this money on destroying the rain forest, perhaps the money would be better spent on the poor and indigenous people of Brazil, Argentina, and Venezuela. Not Bush, he'd rather let them starve so his rich oil buddies can get richer on the backs of the poor while putting our ecological future at risk.

Story here
Story here
Story here

Now, people accuse liberals of being unpatriotic and unAmerican, but the fact of the matter remains that George W. Bush and his oil buddies are destroying the environment. They couldn't kill innocent animals in ANWAR so they want to go to the rain forest and destroy even more Animals.

But for environmentalist, it isn't about hate America. Does anybody really believe that environmentalist are only concerned about bringing the American economy down? If it was about "Hate America" then environmentalist everywhere would turn the other cheek if more moderate governments did it too. I garuntee that if China, North Korea, Cuba, or even the country that Hugo Chavez is from, we'd all be up in arms.

Regardless of who's doing it, know this, environmentalist are pro-America and they are Patriotic, and protecting the environment is Pro-America. Environmentalist world wide have a say in the destruction of our planet, whether George Bush wants to do it in Anwar, off the Gulf Coast, in Iraq, or in the South American Rain forest.

Now, before you comment, it would serve you well to actually read more of this blog than just one post.

Last week we were discussing slavery, animal rights, and the rights of the homeless. Many of you think that I was being harsh on M.A. beause he didn't blame Bush, however, you shouldn't complain because I will give you an 'F' along with some electroshock therapy. Don't ever question your liberal leaders.

The point is, that the term 'slavery' can be interpreted, I'm proud to say, "liberally". It can apply to animals, the homeless, the working class, even housewives. In short, slavery is a word to remind people how oppressed they are. Try it when you go home, if your parents or spouse wants you to do something around the house, tell them "Do it yourself, I'm not your slave"

Let's open up our bibles to the first page. The Declaration of Independence. Starting on the second paragraph we see a major fault in Republican thinking. This goes to show just how illiterate Republicans truly are. The way Republicans read the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence is:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Now, we all know that this is completely incorrect because the way it was supposed to be written is as follows:

We hold our truths to be self-evident, that when all people are created, they were created from a cluster of cells and allowed to exist by their parents so that they can have their own individual higher power as they see fit. That the truth that is self evident is that all men are not equal and that it is the duty of governments to ensure that all men live and die equal.

It is the governments responsibility to make sure that all people are equal from womb to tomb. Why should some people be wealthy while others live in poverty? Why should some people have big houses while some are without a place to rest their head?

Think about this, who wants to be sad while everybody else is happy? Is it fair that some people are happy while you are sad? Is it fair that some people are happily married while the person you love doesn't want you?

Is it fair that somebody makes $10,000 a month while you are unemployed? Shouldn't that person who is working pay you six months salary while you look for a job? Why should he be happy while you are without a job? Is it fair?

Is it fair that people destroy forest for wood to build houses while so many people around the world live in tin huts? Is it fair that people destroy the environment with big SUV's while people who care about the environment drive small compact cars? Is it fair that children have violent games and playstations while other children in America are starving under George W. Bush?

Fair is making sure everybody is as happy as you are when you are miserable.

Fair is making sure that the rich are as rich as you are when you're in poverty.

Is it fair that so many people spend money on worthless things like tattoos, rock concerts, beer, televisions, or even illegal drugs while so many elderly people have had their medicine stolen right out of their bathrooms by George Bush's rich pharmacuetical friends?

It's not fair that some people have more than others so it only makes sense to take away from the people who have more and give to the less fortunate until everybody is equally happy and sad. That's fair.

It's a liberal right of passage to ensure that everybody is equal.

Evil Republicans will fill try to fill you heads with Roman Republican Hitler brainwashing and tell you that some people work harder than others, or choose different paths through life, that in this country everybody has equal opportunity.

Myth #1 - Some people work harder than others

Can you believe the arrogance of this? Some people work harder than others? We all know that people that own businesses spend the entire day on the golf courses smoking cigars and doing nothing else all day.

Yet, there are many, many people that work extremely hard as Professional Daytime Talkshow Analyst, earning slave wages and only getting paid once a month. The only way they will even get a pay raise is to go through the hardcore labor of giving childbirth. A Professional Daytime Talkshow Analyst is way underpaid.

Myth #2 - People choose different paths through life

This statement is laughable. Everybody that I know would love to be rich if they could be. Don't you want to be rich? It's not your fault that you were not born rich. It's not your fault that your higher power didn't bless you to be as fortunate as other people

Many times people are unjustly fired from their jobs. Usually it's because their greedy boss doesn't like his slaves, I mean employees because they are a minority or a woman and doesn't want to pay him more so he just fires them with no justifiable reason. Some people can't get that job that pays them more because nobody ever came to their door and offered it to them.

Myth #3 - In this country everybody has equal opportunity

Bull-caca-meme, everybody has equal opportunity? Everybody knows that rich minority and poor white person are both oxymorons. Everybody knows that women are not as capable of making as much money as men.

Everybody knows that when business hires people that they make their decisions on who are related to their friends. Have you ever heard of a business that hires a person based on who the businessman actually thinks will benefit his company the most? That's simply not the way it works. A business man hires his friends because he thinks his friends should have a job.

Any way folks, our time is up so it's time for your homework assignment. When you complete your homework assignment, post it on your blog and then send me a trackback letting me know that it is complete. I will grade your homework assignment on your blog, however, if I don't leave a grade, then that means you got a 'C' since we don't fail anybody here. Everybody deserves at least 'C'. I will recognize the best homework turned in during next weeks class.

Name something that rich people can own that poor people should?

Should Government abolish it completely or make it an entitlement for the poor?

lc liberal church MNBS Monday Night Bible Study

Tips on being more Liberal

1. When driving through a parking lot drive around for several minutes, even hours if necessary to find the closet parking spot next to the building. If, while driving around a car is pulling out, speed up and hit them so you can sue them. Remember, people owe you something and it doesn't matter what kind of financial shape the other person is in, you are more important.

2. When standing in a line at a store, be sure to find something to get mad about, that way, you can project your anger off onto the clerk checking you until they can't take it anymore. Once they start yelling back at you, and if they are liberal, they will yell back because like you, they are more important than everybody else. This will get them fired and you can then sue the store for mental distress, even though you started it, but make sure you blame the store.

3. When looking for a job, take all applications that you acquired and shove them under the couch cushion. Then lay on the couch all day and guard those applications. If you fail to do this, they won't magically fill theirself out and give you a job. Also, failure to do this keeps opportunity knocking on your door. Just lay there on the couch, watching television, and sooner or later you will have somebody knocking on your door offering you a job starting at $15 an hour because that's how much you deserve for starting pay. Do not accept a job for anything less, because as you know, you are more important than everybody else.

4. If you are bumming money, be sure not to take a shower for weeks. This helps expediate the process of bumming money. Once people smell you, they realize how much you need the money and they begin to throw money at you. However, sometimes you get a selfish Republican type that doesn't understand that you are more important than he is. He may ask you "why should he work and you don't have too?". If this happens, tell him that you do work, that you work cleaning up the streets, or something like that. Then you curse at him because you are more important than he is and he's too stupid to understand that.

5. Parents, as you know children will do what ever they want to do, even though you are the most important person in the world and everybody owes you something. Do not encourage your children to abstain from having sex, in fact encourage them by giving them condoms. When giving them condoms be sure to tell them "I know you are going to do want you want to do anyway so when having sex, we HOPE you want to wear condoms". You can't tell them to wear condoms because as you know children will do what they want to do anyway so it doesn't help to tell them to wear condoms. In fact, don't get mad at your children when they fight, skip school, join gangs, or anything else. Children are just going to do what they want to do so you don't need to worry at all.

2 Years of Blogging

Ah, this brain bullet makes me think of Sutter and Eminent Domain....

August 5, 2004

"Property is surely a right of mankind as real as liberty." --John Adams and I thought that was a pretty good post that went with it.

And then I discovered Firefox... it seems like so much longer that I have been using firefox.

August 2, 2004

I have made a switch. I no longer am using Internet Explorer. From now on I am using Firefox Mozilla. It seems to have stopped my popup problem so I will continue to use it. Thank you Mozilla.

Even though it was in London, the blame America first crowd had their say in this movie... It's America's fault because they got involved in Iraq and England became the target of terrorist attacks.

Also, Homosexuals are 'oppressed' for no reason, and 'Christians' are the big government oppressors. Oh and the big Pharmacuetical companies were a big part of the oppression. Oh, the 'Koran' was against the law and a thing of 'beauty'.

Oh, the 'Voice of London' was a Limbaugh like character. The conservative party was duping the public, and I think that's about it for liberal propaganda in the movie. Outside of that, the movie was pretty good, but don't waste 10 bucks on this movie, I already did that for you.

However, comparing this to Jughead (Jarhead) this movie is a must see on DVD, whereas Jughead was a 'must throw away' on DVD. Really, watch it on DVD.

The following post is a call to conservatives to unite this election cycle to make sure that the left does not win. Each word in this post links to a different conservative blog. I hope that you enjoy it.

"I, _____, do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

Defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. All enemies, foreign and domestic. Foreign and domestic. Domestic.

While our military is busy fighting and dismantling our foreign enemies, our domestic enemies have stepped up their battle against our country. Time and time again, those that do not wish to see America succeed have used every ounce of energy to ensure that America fails in its mission to defend freedom.

If one were to listen to America's domestic enemies, one would think that Hugo Chavez was the pride and joy of liberty. You'd think, after listening to enemies of America, that President George Bush was the world's greatest terrorist. You'd think that Americans deserved 9-11.

Yet, time and time again, we are told not to question each other's Patriotism, despite how much disdain for this country a person shown. These domestic enemies would have us believe that Patriotism means to desire America's defeat.

For many, Patriotism means not to fight terrorist in countries that breed terrorism, but to fight them here within our borders. Patriotism, for them, means to stand for Palestinians as they bomb Israel, all the while, they are blaming Israel for Palestinian behavior.

And though our friends in uniform are actively fighting for freedom overseas, it's the duty of American citizens not surrender those very freedoms that our military is fighting for. It's our duty to keep freedom intact, so that when the men and women in uniform return home, they recognize the country they left.

Our domestic enemies have yet to show that they are truly concerned with the freedoms that belong to all men, regardless of country. It's the love of freedom that desires liberty for all, not just Americans. It's the faith that all men are created equal that gives credence to the belief that all nations are capable of living with liberty and without tyranny.

We have a choice this year as to which direction our country goes. That fork in the road can lead us in two very different directions. That fork in the road is called the Elections of 2006.

That choice we have, can either lead us on the course that we are heading. It's a course that hasn't been easy because the desire of the enemy is strong. That desire has only been strengthened by the enemy within. A defeat to the domestic enemies is a giant blow to the strength and will of our foreign enemies.

The other choice is to vote off course, to lead our nation into a much greater division during a time of war. A decision to divide this country even further while one party controls a congress that would be fighting tooth and nail against the President as he leads this fight against terrorism. A decision that encourages terrorism as withdrawing our troops would save them from the jaws of defeat. And to keep the President from putting conservatives on the Supreme Court.

That choice means a congress that believes America is at fault for 9-11. That choice means congress will spend more time on new laws in the name of security and much less time on defending freedom. That choice means congress will empower big government to protect us from ourselves, but won't address terrorism at its core. The choice is clear, finish the war, our let the government bring the war home. What will you choose?

For the Wright Wing Militia, that choice is clear. The War on Terrorism must be fought and won on foreign soil. A loss in Iraq will encourage our smaller enemies like Iran, North Korea, and Venezuela. The love of America is the love of freedom, and that the love of freedom requires, at times, war.

The Wright Wing bloggers understands that the overzealous want of peace leads to greater wars, but the willingness to go to war, brings peace. It is for peace that the war must be won, failure only leads to more battles.

So while the Main Stream Media speaks of division within the Republican Party and the left wing gets bolder, the Wright Wing Militia gears up and prepare for battle. The Wright Wing Militia won't go down that easy, as Dan Rather and others found out in 2004. The battle for 2006 is just beginning and I assure you that the Wright Wing Militia will be ready!

I hope you enjoy!

In other news, I have had a very busy week. I have had lots of work to do. Since people don't just give me money, I have to go earn it. It's not a pretty sight. Sometimes I wish I were a Democrat because it's so much easier than getting a job. Sit around watching Oprah Winfrey, demanding that hard working people give me more of their money, calling myself compassionate because I want people to give to me, and all the while, I blame the Republicans because I'm poor.

Unfortunately, I'm one of those uncompassionate people that works hard so the government can take money from me and give it to others and take credit for being compassionate. For once, I wish these "compassionate people" would focus more on giving their own money, than they do other people's money.

But work hasn't been the only thing that's prevented me from blogging. This blog has prevented me from blogging. That's right, I blame the blog. Those liberal churches and bible studies takes a lot of time to do, but the ODE TO BLOGS are even more tedious and time consuming. Yes, another ODE TO BLOG is coming up and hopefully it gives Technorati a headache.

Finally, I have a small change in my lexicon. No longer will the Governors mansion be called the Governors Mansion, at least in Louisiana. Since George W. Bush does business out of the 'West Wing', then Kathleen Blanco must work out of the 'Waste Wing'.

Amendment XIII

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Slavery is defined as 'being forced to do something against your will by Republicans with out just compensation. When Republicans schedule you to work, without paying you extra, is in itself a form of slavery and is unconstitutional. More plainly spoken a violation of our bible. Remember, that does not apply to liberals, you must obey all liberal Democrats. A great example is Wal-mart which underpays it's employees, while on the other hand some companies that do the same thing are not in violation. The difference? Wal-mart gives more money to Republicans than they do Democrats, thus they qualify as sweatshop status and are in violation of the bible. Wal-mart is unconstitutuional.

I want to call the class's attention to a dissertation from one average student. Let me read a bit to you...

Yeah, you read that title correctly.

Where exactly do humans get the idea that it's a good thing to kidnap other creatures, and put them in cages? The reason given by zoo advocates is human education. But that answer doesn't wash. First of all, what makes our knowledge of another species more important than their freedom?

That's a nice attempt at being liberal but can anybody tell me why this dissertation would fail to be of the liberalus cum laude quality?

Nobody? No rising stars in this class? You there, in the back, please rise. Tell me, what you thought.

Student: "Well sir, I think he did a wonderful job of identifying oppression."

Prof PP: "Yes, what else?"

Student: "And he also spoke of the poor not being taken care of by the government"

Prof PP: "Yes, but what is wrong with it, there are some key elements missing. What are they?"

Student: "He didn't blame Bush?"

Prof PP: "Correct-a-mundo! You may have a seat"

George H(itler) W(armonger) Bush did not shoulder any of the blame, in fact he blames the mayor. The mayor? Obviously he didn't do his research. The mayor is Antonio R. Villaraigosa and he is a liberal, though he prefers to be called 'a progressive'. This is totally unacceptable.

He even blamed Villaraigosa for the homeless problem in Los Angeles, when in fact, whenever a liberal is in control of the city, he fails to take care of his own people because of the Republicans. In this case, his best bet would be to blame Governor Arnold Schwartzanegger, since he's the Republican Governor of California. However, sometimes you can't blame the Gov., so in those situations, blame the Republican President. It's always acceptable to blame Republicans.

Another thing that M.A. failed to do was compare the zoos to torture as effectively as possible. Off the top of my head, he could have titled his dissertation "A-ZOO GHRAIB" but even better would have been "A ZOO SLAVE" or "The Elephant Holocaust". Anytime you can remind people of Abu Ghraib, the Nazi's, slavery, and/or torture, and mention the zionist warmonger named Bush, you are well on your way to high quality writing. Why are these words so important?

1. Slavery - To remind blacks they better vote Democrat or Republicans will kill them.
2. Holocaust - To make people think about the 'H' in the Satan Bush's name (Hitler).
3. Abu Ghraib - To make people think about their own destiny in Bush's torture chambers if he doesn't get impeached.
4. Torture - Same as three.

Getting back to the positive aspects of M.A.'s prose, I found it simply marvellous that he was able to talk about both the oppression of homeless people and the oppression of elephants in the torture chambers called disguised by a nice name.

Many Republicans will laugh at him and call him an radical, but remember, all Republicans are Right Wing Christian Extremist, therefor they are wrong. M.A. is to be applauded for taking such a breath taking risk and having the courage to bring moderate thinking to the public. Most people are moderates, and with courageous people like M.A. speaking out against Bush making war against elephants for his rich oil buddies, more will stand up and speak out.

Defending M.A.

Had he simply blamed Bush and said something about Iraq, terrorism, or Abu Ghraib, this would be very easy to defend. However, that's why I chose this piece. My students need to know how to defend the undefendable!

So what I would do to defend this is the first line of defense, accuse his opposition of "supporting slavery" and "avoiding the real issue of homeless people"

Since he didn't blame Bush, it's your responsibility to pick up his slack. You blame Bush for spending money for the homeless on the war for oil in Iraq.

Accuse the person he is opposed to this of not caring about little 9 year old girls that sleep on cardboard boxes.

Folks, we are almost out of time, so we will conclude this class on another day, but your homework assignment...

1. Write an article on the suffering and oppression of zoo animals.
2. Point out how the money could be spent on the poor
3. Find a title that reminds people of Satan Bush
4. Find a way to blame REPUBLICANS.
(If you blame Bush, you have to include Cheney and Rove, and tie it in with Iraq.
5. Accuse Republicans of violating Amendment XIII
6. Compare Republicans to Nazis
7. Address the negative impact on the environment that the Zoos are having
8. Explain why taxes need to be raised on the rich.
Extra Credit Find reasons why people who oppose your prose are uncompassionate

Fortunately it won't be Hillary Clinton either, but unfortunately it will be somebody. Hopefully it's a conservative-Democrat, but it will at least be a governor.

2 years excerpts

Ah, John Kerry's salute and speech....Acceptance speech acceptable? (6-30-2004)

"You'll get to pick your own doctor" - John Kerry during his DNC convention speech.

--"Really? Oh goody goody, I get to pick my own doctor? I hope I pick a good one. The problem that I have with the healthcare system isn’t the rising cost of greedy doctors. In fact, it seems to me that ever since big government proponents like Kerry have gotten involved in the healthcare system, it seems as though the problem is getting worse. Today, government has more involvement in healthcare than ever, yet the system seems to be getting worse." --- My response

Can you believe that Louisiana has a gubernatorial candidate named "Horne"? This is just too much, I mean forgive me for going a little overboard here but... with Reaganites, Clintonites, Bushies, and Deaniacs, does that mean that his followers are going to be called Hornies? When they go to campaign fundraiser, will everybody there feel hornier?

But he's got some must have gifts that is bound to go up in value. This is just classic, better get one before it sells out....

Hornier people can buy these at Horne's campaign store! Question is, does this campaign paraphenelia make you feel hornier?

2 years of blogging excerpts.

Just one tonight kiddies... from Why I'm Voting for President Bush (6-13-2004)

Though many freedoms were lost after 9-11 we must remember that this administration resisted the demand to infringe on many other freedoms. For some the solution was to pass a myriad of laws, many of which had nothing to do with terrorism. Some thought that requiring that everybody have national ID card was the solution. President Bush insisted on going after the bad guys, not punish the good guys.

Night kiddies

Read the story.

President Hugo Chavez has pulled Venezuela steadily to the left, and now he’s even got the horse on the national flag running that way.

Venezuela’s solidly pro-Chavez National Assembly has given final approval to changes in the flag proposed by the socialist president: an eighth star and a turnabout of the horse that until now has galloped to the right.

The move clears the way for Chavez to unfurl the new national banner on Flag Day on Sunday.

No big deal right? Wrong. I've warned time and time again that Hugo Chavez is not a peaceful man. Hugo Chavez is building his military because he wants war. He's buttering up people here in the States winning critics of the Bush administration over so they would be on his side and help force the United States to stay on the sidelines while he gets down to business.

The change of the horse is no big deal, but the addition of the star is.

Chavez suggested the eighth star to represent the early 19th-century eastern province of Guayana, which was initially loyal to Spain but then joined an independent Venezuela.

South American independence hero Simon Bolivar once proposed a flag with eight stars in 1817, and it was used for several years. Chavez has called the eighth star the “Bolivarian star” – like his “Bolivarian Revolution,” which he says is leading the oil-producing country toward socialism.

Still no big deal right? Wrong, this may be a very significant thing and a huge indicator of what Hugo Chavez is planning on doing in the next few years. The pipeline that is going to "destroy the environment" as it rips and roars through rainforest from Caracas to Buenos Aires will most likely keep Chavez busy for a couple of years, but then watch out Guayana. That's a big if Guayana has that long. My suspicions are that Chavez will wait until the Presidential elections in the United States before he makes his move.

Hugo Chavez and Venezuela have been arguing for years that east Guayana is Venezuelan territory. Though it's sparcely populated and mostly jungle, Venezuela seems to hunger after that strip of land. Perhaps they insist on having all of Guyana, which would make more sense because Guayana has been attempting unsuccessfully to drill for oil in the waters that seperate Guayana from Suriname. Each time Guayana attempts to drill for oil, Suriname uses it's military to force Guayana to stop. Guayana does not have the military force to stand up to Suriname, much less Venezuela.

Like Austria and Kuwait before them, Guayana is a sleeping lamb next to a hungry wolf. Should Venezuela invade Guayana in order to drill for oil, niether Guayana nor Suriname has the ability to stop them. It would be in Americans best interest to intervene, to stop this hungry wolf before he kills to many lambs.

But with many American Liberals on his side, Huggable Hugo may turn out to be Latins Little Hitler.

Vietnam wasn’t loss due to lack of valor on behalf of soldiers, Vietnam was lost due to the lack of willingness of leaders to eradicate tyranny and we have been paying the consequences of that mistake ever since. In the sixties, peace was not won by our withdrawal in Vietnam; war was wrought on the rest of the world because of it. The cowards of men dictated Vietnam policy and many new wars were created because of it. The war did not end because we chose peace, it only began wars in other countries.

Excerpts from the last 2 years

- - - - - -

Sunshine Patriots

Vietnam wasn’t loss due to lack of valor on behalf of soldiers, Vietnam was lost due to the lack of willingness of leaders to eradicate tyranny and we have been paying the consequences of that mistake ever since. In the sixties, peace was not won by our withdrawal in Vietnam; war was wrought on the rest of the world because of it. The cowards of men dictated Vietnam policy and many new wars were created because of it. The war did not end because we chose peace, it only began wars in other countries.

That was a classic piece...

- - - - - -

Ahhh, then there were the Brain Bullets for the Cerebral Uzi

Brain Bullet

"He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

I really ought to bring those back....

- - - - - -

This is one that's from the heart.

Freedom

We say we love our Rights but never take the time to read the Constitution. We say we love freedom but after a tragedy rush to surrender more freedoms? Wasn’t this the case after 9-11? Even today, we demand the government to place greater restrictions on our neighbors despite not having an attack within our borders since that day.

Sounds like something I could write today. Despite not having an attack inside our borders, we still don't feel secure enough... can anybody say Arabic Port Deal?

- - - - - -

And finally, my tribute to Ronald Wilson Reagan, may he rest in peace..

Ronald Reagan and Great Leadership

Whether it was a radio joke or standing in front of the Berlin wall, Ronald Reagan was steadfast in his beliefs that the Soviet Union was an evil empire. Like most great leaders, Reagan had his critics, and like the other great leaders, Reagan knew what he believed. Reagan was not without his critics, his SDI proposals were ridiculed. Reagan said to be the dumbest president ever, and stories were told of elderly who ate dog food. Reagan would not waver and his critics eventually became forgotten. Reagan led this country, even the men who did not want to be led. Many men did not want go, many did against their will, but we are forever grateful that they did. Thank you President Ronald Reagan for being leader.