CrispAds Blog Ads






Welcome to
JEFFBLANCO.BLOGDRIVE.COM
Email: Louisianaconservative@email.com

Yahoo IM: Avman82000

Louisiana..

CrispAds Blog Advertising

***Warning - Reader Beware!***
This blog has been banned in several countries. Countries include, but are not limited to the following:

Chile
China
Cuba
Iran
North Korea
Venezuela
Iraq
(A big thank you to our soldiers)
Afghanistan
(A big thank you to our soldiers)

Should the Democrats change their name to the Democoward party?
Yes
No
  
Free polls from Pollhost.com

Locations of visitors to this page
   

<< October 2004 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02
03 04 05 06 07 08 09
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

If you are interested in keeping up with the Right Wing Blogosphere or interested in promoting your right wing blog, please click the following button and sign up. You will get a daily digest of right wing bloggers that have posted for the day.

Click here to join VRWCbloggers
Click to join VRWCbloggers

From my fans!

I hope you don't make it back from your trip.
Maybe the Conservitive Lord God in Heaven, Hallowed be His name would grace the entire planet with your demise. -- Conservitive_Homocide

"What a hateful, ignorant sonofab---- you are."---Some guy who was too embarrassed to give his name.

"Jeff Blanco sounds like a man deranged; much worse than my favorite columnist [Jeff Sadow] at the increasingly partisan (was that possible?) website [PoliticsLA.com]."---TIMSHEL

"My favorite right-wing blogger that annoys the sh*t out of me but who I can't help reading."---Chepooka

"Thinking like this just scares me."---John's Blog

"you've got to be on some serious drugs to post sh-- like this"---I voted for George

=============

I am willing to allow advertising in the comments section for only $5.00 a day/three month minimum. All comment spammers are much appreciated and I will contact your site about billing. However, I feel obligated to inform you that I don't believe the majority of my readers are going to gamble. We have casinos that people could go too. =============


Ronald Reagan
1911-2004

=============

I think you ought to enjoy this political forum

=============

If your blog is linked to my blog and for some reason it isn't listed on my blog roll, please send me an email notifying me of it and also the state that your blog originates out of.
Thank you

Freedom Blogs
GOP Bloggers
By State

01. Alabama
Beyond Salvage
The Bad Hair Blog
The Bull Speaks
Cut On the Bias
Rants of the Conservative Mind
Political Man
Travelling Shoes

02. Alaska

03. Arizona

04. Arkansas

05. California
Al Quds
A Modern American
Pearly Gates
Powder Blue Report
Republican Atheist Rocket Science Man
The Conservative Republican
California Conservatives 4 Truth.
American & Proud

06. Colorado
Twenty First Century Republican
Colorado Conservative
The Drum and Cannon
Clay Calhoun

07. Connecticut
MuD & PHuD

08. Delaware

09. Florida
Rob Lawson
Guns and Glory
Strong Conservative

10. Georgia
Considerettes
Liberal Utopia

11. Hawaii
Electric Venom

12. Idaho

13. Illinois
In Bills World
Liberty Just In Case

14. Indiana
Asmodeus
The Low Down

15. Iowa

16. Kansas
Mr.Pilot

17. Kentucky

18. Louisiana
Freedom Matters
The River Ring
Anti Semantics
Chris Boudreaux
Democrats Give Conservatives Indigestion
Louisiana Conservative
The Conservative Cajun
The Opinionator
Maybe I think Too Much
The Blog That Care Forgot
The Vitter Blog
Bayou Brawl
Wynn Report
Jeff Sadow
GOP Of The Youth
Fried Green Blog

19. Maine
The Better Wing

20. Maryland
Conservative Push
Mad Anthony
Michelle Malkin
2008 Political Perspective

21. Massachusetts
Erik Smith
Solomonia

22. Michigan
Catholic Analysis
Conservative Eyes
Marcland
Miss O'Hara
Grand Rapids Confidential

23. Minnesota
Pink Monkey Bird

24. Mississippi
EZ's Blog

25. Missouri
MYTHARC
Aardvark Alley

26. Montana

27. Nebraska
Non Box Thinking

28. Nevada

29. New Hampshire
Conservative Blogger

30. New Jersey
Drowned Land

31. New Mexico

32. New York
CCS178
America's Glory

33. North Carolina
Jenn Martinez
The Conservative
Just Bloggin

34. North Dakota

35. Ohio
Esoteric*Diatribe
Jims Police Website
Ohio Guy
Camp Katrina Blog

36. Oklahoma
Passionate America
ArklahomaBoy

37. Oregon

38. Pennsylvania
The Terriorists
Political Annotation
Yelling at the Windshield
The Stark Truth
Right Wing Professor

39. Rhode Island

40. South Carolina
The Liberal Lie, the Conservative Truth.

41. South Dakota

42. Tennessee
Moore Thoughts

43. Texas
GM Roper
Texas Conservative
John's Conservative Thoughts
Courtney

44. Utah

45. Vermont

46. Virginia
American Warmonger
Commonwealth Conservative
The Southern Conservative
Political Prognostications
DemOut
NIF

47. Washington
Horologium

48. West Virginia
Bittersweet
Gunner

49. Wisconsin
Marsh Rants

50. Wyoming
Niner Charlie
The Other Point of View

Join the freedom blogs, ask me how


Glenn Reynolds Says
    "I have forged documents that prove Jeff Blanco forgot his doctor appointment. It doesn't matter if the documents are forged, what matters is that Jeff Blanco is avoiding the issue. "

Site Meter

Pachyderms of Greater Baton Rouge. amateureconblogGot DesignDelphiki TOP LATINO BLOGS Politics Blog Top SitesDirectory of Politics Blogs


If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:


rss feed

Sunday, October 03, 2004
You didn't have to be so nice.

I was at a friends house today and noticed that her daughter was watching the MTV Video Music Awards again. When the Kerry girls came onstage I said "Oh watch this!". Yes, this was the moment that the Kerry girls got booed. Only they did not get booed. MTV edited out the booes and inserted cheers even going so far as to show the crowd applauding loudly. The girls were completely calm and even the background had changed. Alexis didn't even have to lift her finger too shush the crowd. But the best part? The Bush girls were completely taken out. How is that for free speech? Only the Kerry girls are allowed free speech, not the VMA crowd and most certainly not the Bush girls.

By they way, have you ever noticed that nobody sees things more black and white than our friends on the left do? Anything that a liberal Democrat does is perfect, no matter what it is {White} while anything that a conservative Republican does is evil and wrong, no matter what it is{Black}?

Anyway, I couldn't believe it. I couldn't believe my ears as I listened to my fellow Republicans slam Bush after the first presidential debate. I understand you think he's next to God but he really isn't. You got the real Bush on Thursday night and were suprised by him. Was he really so different Thursday night then he was during his acceptance speech? And don't tell me how tired he was, I know he's tired, he's the President.

This is going to be a real shocker to you Republicans who think Bush looked terrible during that first debate, but I got to tell you, He isn't the most eloquent speaker. Where have you folks been?

One thing that is being missed by my fellow conservatives is that the Democrats are betting everything on their view that the American public is stupid. The American public is not stupid. They do realize what's at stake, they do realize that the Senator isn't straight forward. They do realize that Kerry IS the anti-Iraq candidate while Bush is the pro-Iraq candidate. Kerry, has only given credibilty to Bush's decision to take out Hussien. John Kerry admitted that we did the right thing with Iraq. Everything the Democrat party has been saying about Bush the entire time has been flushed down the John by Kerry. Bush knew he did the right thing, and now we know he did the right thing. Thank you Senator Kerry.

Immediately after the debates in 2000, the consensus was that ALGORE had won. After each debate, the numbers would show a clear victory for ALGORE. Yet, ALGORE did not get the lead he expected from the debates. Gore supposedly won, but what good is it to win the debates, if you do not convince your audience to vote for you? ALGORE didn't do it, niether did John Kerry. In fact, I want to ask you to think back to the debates and tell me, after seeing them side by side, Who would you rather have a beer with? Who would you rather watch the superbowl with? Bush might have looked terrible, but I'd rather have a beer with Bush, I'd rather watch the Superbowl with Bush, I'd rather vote for Bush. I trust Bush over Kerry, so will the American public.

It's that simple, Kerry came off as being fake, unbelieveable, like the high school Barbie who will smile through anything, yet doesn't treat people with respect. John Kerry just looked fake. That smile Kerry had really disturbed me, it was just fake.

But let's get to the substance of the debate....since you folks are too busy whining over your new discovery that Bush has speech problems. Let's take a serious look at Kerry's speech problems.

"The president hasn't put one nickel, not one nickel into the effort to fix some of our tunnels and bridges and most exposed subway systems. That's why they had to close down the subway in New York when the Republican Convention was there. We hadn't done the work that ought to be done.

The president -- 95 percent of the containers that come into the ports, right here in Florida, are not inspected. Civilians get onto aircraft, and their luggage is X-rayed, but the cargo hold is not X- rayed."---- Senator Kerry, are you proposing a police state?

"When I was in a rope line just the other day, coming out here from Wisconsin, a couple of young returnees were in the line, one active duty, one from the Guard. And they both looked at me and said: We need you. You've got to help us over there."----Oh Senator, you wait in rope lines? Well, maybe next time I'll be in line with you.

"And what we need now is a president who understands how to bring these other countries together to recognize their stakes in this. They do have stakes in it. They've always had stakes in it."-----I'm glad you feel that way Senator, so what do you have to say about our current allies?

"But you can't tell me that when the most troops any other country has on the ground is Great Britain, with 8,300, and below that the four others are below 4,000, and below that, there isn't anybody out of the hundreds, that we have a genuine coalition to get this job done." So Senator, are you saying that our current allies are unimportant? With your election, will they withdraw? Well what else do you have to say about coalition building?

"We could have bilateral talks with Kim Jong Il. And we can get those weapons at the same time as we get China. Because China has an interest in the outcome, too."-----So you won't build a coalition in dealing with North Korea? Would you deal with them unilaterally if necessary?

"It [IRAQ] was a threat. That's not the issue. The issue is what you do about it."-----------Senator Kerry, thank you for admitting that Iraq was a threat, and we did do something about it instead of waiting around for Iraq to become a much bigger threat.


Posted at 12:14 am by Avman

Rob W
October 5, 2004   03:42 PM PDT
 
Jeremy,

Apology accepted. Now, how about a cite to some of those figures. Not just a round number, but actual Pentagon numbers as in the Reuters story. Let's get this conversation going on real facts. If you want to dispute my facts, give me some other ones of a precise nature. The numbers Reuters provided came from DoD figures. We are in trouble there and the President has been unwilling to admit it. I have a sneaking suspicion that he will admit it tommorow in his "special speech."
Jeremy
October 5, 2004   12:01 AM PDT
 
Rob W,

I am NAME. Screwed up the title.

Over the past few days I've heard people from everywhere come out and say all sorts of "other" numbers. They were usually 22K to 50K. I retract my puppet statement. The 50K comes from the DNC site. The 22K appears to come from the "minimally effective" number you sited. The "revised" question is now: what is the REAL number. Both Bush and Allawi (the puppet as per the DNC, I'll give quotes if you would like) give a number of 100,000 trained. However, there is another quote by Allawi saying 50,000? Which one is right? Multiple papers are saying multiple things.

Again, sorry about the puppet thing. Ever since Joe Lockheart called Allawi a puppet I've been rather liberal with the word.
Rob W
October 4, 2004   02:58 PM PDT
 
Jeff,

I stand corrected. OK other guy, comments originally directed to Jeff are directed to you.

Rob

p.s. Sorry about my screwed up comment.
Jeffery
October 4, 2004   01:00 PM PDT
 
That wasn't me, that was somebody who left the name 'Name' there. When I comment in the comment section, I post my name.
Rob W
October 4, 2004   08:57 AM PDT
 
Also Jeffrey, please don't accuse me of "puppeting" numbers. I assure you, I do my research, and provide actual citiations to that of which I speak. Good, democractic, free debate should not include personal attacks. Argumentation is the art of debating about arguments and their premises, not going after someone personally. That said, I will continue to return here, as I love to argue.
Rob W
October 4, 2004   08:50 AM PDT
 
As to the 100,000, I refer you to the following quote from an article from Reuters, found at http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=worldNews&storyID=590914&section=news

"90,000 currently in the police force, only 8,169 have had the full eight-week academy training. Another 46,176 are listed as "untrained," and it will be July 2006 before the administration reaches its new goal of a 135,000-strong, fully trained police force.

Six Army battalions have had "initial training," while 57 National Guard battalions, 896 soldiers in each, are still being recruited or "awaiting equipment." Just eight Guard battalions have reached "initial (operating) capability," and the Pentagon acknowledged the Guard's performance has been "uneven."

Training has yet to begin for the 4,800-man civil intervention force, which will help counter a deadly insurgency. And none of the 18,000 border enforcement guards have received any centralised training to date, despite earlier claims they had, according to Democrats on the U.S. House of Representatives Appropriations Committee.

They estimated that 22,700 Iraqi personnel have received enough basic training to make them "minimally effective at their tasks," in contrast to the 100,000 figure cited by Bush."

These are real numbers Jeff. I want to win in Iraq as much as the next guy--we owe the Iraqi's that. But let's be honest here, things aren't going as well as they should. We have the best armed forces in the world, but aren't winning. Yet Bush continues to insist we are. One of the things a commander owes his troops his honesty about the situation they are going into. Bush refuses to do that for political reasons.


Rob
Rob W
October 4, 2004   08:46 AM PDT
 
Jeff,

From what I heard, what had happened at the VMA was that while the Kerry children were up on stage at the VMA's, video of the Bush kids went up on the video. Although the Kerry daughters attempted to stop it, the VMA audience booed the President's daughters. Regardless of who was booed it wasn't the decent thing to do. People should show respect for others.
Name
October 4, 2004   02:05 AM PDT
 
If Rob W would like to take note that the number of 100,000 came from Tommy Franks. And the BS number you were supposed to puppet was 50-60,000 not 8,000.

Jeffrey,

I hope you don't mind if I link this article with special attention to the VMA incident? I heard about the boos too.
Rob W
October 4, 2004   12:53 AM PDT
 
Turns out Kerry convinced a lot of people to vote for him. All three post debate polls show Kerry ahead or tied.

And he didn't lie. Bush claimed that 100,000 Iraqi troops were fighting along side us. Turns out only 8000 have been trained and it will take until 2006 until the full complement promised by the Administration is ready. Face it, your boy blew it with the country. Gigantic deficits, inability to win in Iraq, (Fallujah, Sadr, anyone), and Osama still running around.
Rob
October 4, 2004   12:49 AM PDT
 
T
The Black Republican
October 4, 2004   12:44 AM PDT
 
It'd be really nice if anyone in the MSM - even Fox - would recognize the difference between "winning the debate" and "convincing anyone to vote for them". Heck, even I think Kerry "won on points". That doesn't mean anyone should give him credit for being anything more than a slick, lying politician. And the overnight polls showed just that.

The American people are smarter than than a lot of people give them credit for. Bush by 7 on 11/2.
|  

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry